2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religion and motives for sustainable behaviors: A cross-cultural comparison and contrast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
211
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
11
211
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This study will reveal if attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control will have a correlation and interconnection between them with saving behaviour. The direct positive relationship of attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control underlined in studies conducted by Ajzen (1991;2002), Benk et al (2011), Dowd & Burke (2013, Faye et al (2013), Jen-Ruei et al (2006), Litvine & Wüstenhagen (2011), Minton et al (2015), Taylor & Todd (1995), Tsourgiannis et al (2014), Zocchi (2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This study will reveal if attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control will have a correlation and interconnection between them with saving behaviour. The direct positive relationship of attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control underlined in studies conducted by Ajzen (1991;2002), Benk et al (2011), Dowd & Burke (2013, Faye et al (2013), Jen-Ruei et al (2006), Litvine & Wüstenhagen (2011), Minton et al (2015), Taylor & Todd (1995), Tsourgiannis et al (2014), Zocchi (2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Of importance to note here is our focus on religiosity, rather than religious affiliation, as the key variable of interest given that religiosity describes the degree or strength of one’s religious beliefs (Mathras et al, ), which would also explain the degree or strength of following religious commandments and teachings. Given that prior research shows varying findings regarding the relations between religion and sustainable consumption, with one body of research showing that religious consumers can be more sustainable than less or nonreligious consumers (Leary et al, ; Minton et al, ), and a separate body of research showing the opposite pattern of effects with religious consumers being less sustainable than nonreligious consumers (Minton, ; Wolkomir et al, ), the following competing hypotheses are proposed:
H1 Religiosity positively influences sustainable consumption.
H2 Religiosity negatively influences sustainable consumption .
…”
Section: Religion’s Influence On the Sustainable Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, research indicates that religiosity can sometimes have a moderating effect on the likeliness to engage in sustainable behaviors. For example, in a cross-cultural comparison of Christian, Atheist and Buddhist consumers in the U.S. and South Korea, Minton and colleagues found that highly religious Buddhists were the most likely to engage in sustainable behaviors [25]. An earlier study by Wardekker and colleagues, which explored the role of "Christian voices" in the United States public debate over climate change, identified three distinct types of narrative: conserving the "garden of God" as it was created, tending to the wilderness so that it becomes the "garden" it should be, and a combination of these two in which God's creation is considered both good and changing.…”
Section: Climate Change Cultural Cognition and "Religion"mentioning
confidence: 99%