European Anti-Discrimination and the Politics of Citizenship 2007
DOI: 10.1057/9780230627314_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious Discrimination: Muslims Claiming Equality in the EU

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact in Canada, subjective religiosity among Muslims was associated with lower levels of distress more so than among non-Muslims. These findings are consistent with previous research indicating that ethno-racial origins are more important than religion as a factor in reports of discrimination by Muslims both in France and Canada (Reitz et al 2009, 711; Amiraux 2012, 25, 143).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In fact in Canada, subjective religiosity among Muslims was associated with lower levels of distress more so than among non-Muslims. These findings are consistent with previous research indicating that ethno-racial origins are more important than religion as a factor in reports of discrimination by Muslims both in France and Canada (Reitz et al 2009, 711; Amiraux 2012, 25, 143).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It illustrates the confusion and overlaps that occur in concrete situations, religion being one of the categories intersecting with gender and race in most of the headscarf controversies in EU member states. Muslims figure as a perfect example of the interactive dynamics operating between multiple variables that somehow lead to an "ethnicization" or "racialization" of religious characteristics (Modood, 2007;Phillips, 2007 10 ), Muslim women wearing the headscarf embodying the climax of the complex inequalities challenging antidiscrimination tools (Amiraux, 2007a(Amiraux, , 2007bMalik, 2008). As J. Bowen's comparative contribution to this issue reminds us, both internal (internal restrictions on the rights of believers that originate from their own religious community) and external religious discrimination (equal rights and capacities to practice religion) provide good illustrations of normative grounding for antidiscrimination laws (what he calls "religious fairness"), for they tell us which sorts of discriminations are to be tolerated or condemned both in secular and nonsecular contexts.…”
Section: Discrimination In Europe: What Has Been Left Aside?mentioning
confidence: 99%