2020
DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious Heterogamy and the Intergenerational Transmission of Religion in China

Abstract: In Western societies, religious heterogamy and its effects on religious socialization outcomes have been interpreted through the lens of secularization. How about China, where religion has been resurging in recent decades? Using data from the 2007 Spiritual Life Survey of Chinese Residents, this study shows that despite China's atheist education system and strict religion policies, having at least one religiously affiliated parent is associated with increased religiosity compared to having two nonreligious par… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 81 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Socialization is perceived to have failed in cases of subsequent religious change, which may be one aspect of a broader rebellion against parents (Bengtson et al 2018). Religious socialization is less effective where parents are less committed (Smith 2021; Uecker and Ellison 2012), belong to different religious traditions (McPhail and Yang 2020), and in cases of parental divorce or death (Wilkinson 2018; Zhai et al 2007).…”
Section: Religious Change In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socialization is perceived to have failed in cases of subsequent religious change, which may be one aspect of a broader rebellion against parents (Bengtson et al 2018). Religious socialization is less effective where parents are less committed (Smith 2021; Uecker and Ellison 2012), belong to different religious traditions (McPhail and Yang 2020), and in cases of parental divorce or death (Wilkinson 2018; Zhai et al 2007).…”
Section: Religious Change In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%