2015
DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious Homophily in a Secular Country: Evidence From a Voting Game in France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adida, Laitin, and Valfort (2010) followed this notion and demonstrated that discrimination in the French labor market is actually driven by religion and not ethnicity. The authors confirm the results in an experimental game, which demonstrated that religious similarity is the only significant predictor of homophily, while none of the other predictors (be it gender, age, education, ethnicity, or socioeconomic similarity) had similar predictive power (Adida, Laitin, and Valfort 2015). Choi, Poertner, and Sambanis (2019) conducted a field experiment in Germany measuring assistance provided to immigrants during daily social interactions and could not find any ethnically driven racism or discrimination.…”
Section: Disentangling the Effects Of Ethnic And Religious Minority Endorserssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Adida, Laitin, and Valfort (2010) followed this notion and demonstrated that discrimination in the French labor market is actually driven by religion and not ethnicity. The authors confirm the results in an experimental game, which demonstrated that religious similarity is the only significant predictor of homophily, while none of the other predictors (be it gender, age, education, ethnicity, or socioeconomic similarity) had similar predictive power (Adida, Laitin, and Valfort 2015). Choi, Poertner, and Sambanis (2019) conducted a field experiment in Germany measuring assistance provided to immigrants during daily social interactions and could not find any ethnically driven racism or discrimination.…”
Section: Disentangling the Effects Of Ethnic And Religious Minority Endorserssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Similar to studies of co-ethnicity and co-partisanship, some research shows that individuals express preferences for co-religionists. In an experimental game, Adida, Laitin, and Valfort (2015) find that participants choose leaders with whom they share a religious background. This is not because of increased trust in the leader or a belief they will receive increased material benefits.…”
Section: Foreign Aid Public Opinion and Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fong and Luttmer (2009) find that African American subjects-and white subjects who reported themselves to feel close to their own racial group-were likely to send more to Hurricane Katrina victims in experimental manipulations that increase the perception that victims are of their own race (black, white respectively). Adida, Laitin and Valfort (2015) find that subjects in a laboratory experiment in France who have information about the religion of fellow participants vote for group leaders-empowered to distribute experiment payoffs-of the same religion, although religion ends up not being a significant factor in the leaders' choices once selected. Meer (2011) finds that alumni are more likely to donate to their former universities and that they donate more when they are solicited by same-race individuals.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 91%