2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58904-6_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on the Derivation of Gross-Pitaevskii Equation with Magnetic Laplacian

Abstract: The effective dynamics for a Bose-Einstein condensate in the regime of high dilution and subject to an external magnetic field is governed by a magnetic Gross-Pitaevskii equation. We elucidate the steps needed to adapt to the magnetic case the proof of the derivation of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation within the "projection counting" scheme.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A generalization of the technique used in the proof allows one to cover also the case of one-body Hamiltonians more general than −∆ . This has been pointed out in the single component case in Remark 2.1 in [18]; we refer the reader to [16] for a more detailed analysis of what is needed in order to adapt the argument to the relevant case of the magnetic Laplacian ∆ A = (∇ − iA) 2 Remark 5. Assumption (B1) on the potential is crucial in this formalism; with different techniques (see [2]) it is possible to consider potentials with some singularity and unbounded support.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A generalization of the technique used in the proof allows one to cover also the case of one-body Hamiltonians more general than −∆ . This has been pointed out in the single component case in Remark 2.1 in [18]; we refer the reader to [16] for a more detailed analysis of what is needed in order to adapt the argument to the relevant case of the magnetic Laplacian ∆ A = (∇ − iA) 2 Remark 5. Assumption (B1) on the potential is crucial in this formalism; with different techniques (see [2]) it is possible to consider potentials with some singularity and unbounded support.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A generalization of the technique used in the proof allows one to cover also the case of one-body Hamiltonians more general than −∆ . This has been pointed out in the single component case in Remark 2.1 in [18]; we refer the reader to [16] for a more detailed analysis of what is needed in order to adapt the argument to the relevant case of the magnetic Laplacian ∆ A = (∇ − iA) 2…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The relevance of equation (1.1) is hard to underestimate, both for the interest it deserves per se, given the variety of techniques that have been developed for its study, and for the applications in various contexts in physics. Among the latter, (1.1) is the typical effective evolution equation for the quantum dynamics of an interacting Bose gas subject to an external magnetic field, and as such it can be derived in suitable scaling limits of infinitely many particles [33,41,3,39]: in this context the |u| γ−1 u term with γ = 3 (resp., γ = 5) arises as the self-interaction term due to a two-body (resp., three-body) inter-particle interaction of short scale, whereas the (| · | −α * |u| 2 )u term accounts for a two-body interaction of meanfield type, whence its non-local character. On the other hand (1.1) arises also as an effective equation for the dynamics of quantum plasmas.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be considered as a discrete magnetic Schrödinger operator on graphs. The magnetic Laplacian is widely used in mathematics Colin de Verdière ( 2013) and physics Olgiati (2017). Since it is a complexvalued Hermitian matrix, its eigenvalues are real-valued and eigenvectors are orthonormal.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%