2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00332-018-9500-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on the Emergence of Weak Euler Solutions in the Vanishing Viscosity Limit

Abstract: We prove that if the local second-order structure function exponents in the inertial range remain positive uniformly in viscosity, then any spacetime L 2 weak limit of Leray-Hopf weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations on any bounded domain Ω ⊂ R d , d = 2, 3 is a weak solution of the Euler equations. This holds for both no-slip and Navier-friction conditions with viscosity-dependent slip length. The result allows for the emergence of non-unique, possibly dissipative, limiting weak solutions of the Euler… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical evidence that the dissipation rate is independent of ν for large Re is for example given in Sreenivasan (1998), Kaneda et al (2003) and Orlandi et al (2012), and experimental evidence for example in Pearson, Krogstad & van de Water (2002) and Dubrulle (2019). Under certain regularity or smoothness assumptions (existence of a strong L 3 limit; we refer to Duchon & Robert (2000), Drivas & Nguyen (2019) and Drivas & Eyink (2019) for a precise discussion), weak Euler solutions are the ν → 0 limit of Leray-Hopf weak solutions u ν of the Navier-Stokes equations, so that the dissipation rate in the inviscid limit equals the viscous dissipation rate in the limit ν → 0:…”
Section: Energy Dissipation Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical evidence that the dissipation rate is independent of ν for large Re is for example given in Sreenivasan (1998), Kaneda et al (2003) and Orlandi et al (2012), and experimental evidence for example in Pearson, Krogstad & van de Water (2002) and Dubrulle (2019). Under certain regularity or smoothness assumptions (existence of a strong L 3 limit; we refer to Duchon & Robert (2000), Drivas & Nguyen (2019) and Drivas & Eyink (2019) for a precise discussion), weak Euler solutions are the ν → 0 limit of Leray-Hopf weak solutions u ν of the Navier-Stokes equations, so that the dissipation rate in the inviscid limit equals the viscous dissipation rate in the limit ν → 0:…”
Section: Energy Dissipation Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasize that to date, even the question of whether the weak L 2 t L 2 x inviscid limit holds (against test functions compactly supported in the interior of the domain), remains open. Conditional results have been established recently in terms of interior structure functions [9,11], or in terms of interior vorticity concentration measures [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the condition on weak-convergence at a.e. time t was removed in [31] in favor of assuming a structure function bound within a more precise "inertial range". Also, as pointed out in [18], Remark 3.4, this condition may be removed by assuming a bound on the space-time structure function defined by…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%