2000
DOI: 10.1080/00268970009483366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on the signs ofgfactors in atomic and molecular Zeeman spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various different conventions are used in the literature concerning the sign of the g-factor [43]. Here, we define the sign of the g-factor such that γ > 0 for g > 0 and γ < 0 for g < 0.…”
Section: B Gilbert Damping and Gyromagnetic Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various different conventions are used in the literature concerning the sign of the g-factor [43]. Here, we define the sign of the g-factor such that γ > 0 for g > 0 and γ < 0 for g < 0.…”
Section: B Gilbert Damping and Gyromagnetic Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) the rate of change of the magnetic moment is therefore parallel to the torque for positive g and antiparallel to the torque for negative g. While we are interested in this work in the spectroscopic g-factor, and hence in the relation between the rate of change of the magnetic moment and the torque, Ref. [43] discusses the relation between the magnetic moment m and the angular momentum L that generates it, i.e., m = γ static L. Since differentiation with respect to time and use of T = dL/dt leads to Eq. ( 1) our definition of the signs of g and γ agrees essentially with the one suggested in Ref.…”
Section: B Gilbert Damping and Gyromagnetic Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convention used here follows (iii) Brown et al (2000) with a negative g e (see Chapter 6 and Mohr et al 2008). Further different sign conventions for the electronic g-factor are discussed in Brown et al (2000).…”
Section: Atoms and Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convention used here follows (iii) Brown et al (2000) with a negative g e (see Chapter 6 and Mohr et al 2008). Further different sign conventions for the electronic g-factor are discussed in Brown et al (2000). Historically, g e was defined positive (g e > 0), e is the (positive) elementary charge, therefore γ e < 0 and a minus sign would have to be introduced in the equation for γ e given here.…”
Section: Atoms and Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation