2001
DOI: 10.1007/s004070000027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarques sur l'Histoire du Texte des ÉlÉments d'Euclide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…sometimes corresponding almost word for word (e.g., V-12 and VII-12), does not necessarily imply that Book V was modeled after Book VII, because the coincidence may well be the result of later editorial work. Thus the arithmetic books are by no means a simple residue of the mathematics before the discovery of incommensurability (Vitrac 1990(Vitrac -2001. Thus, even if one admits the existence of "commensurable definition" of proportion in early development, its level of sophistication cannot be retrieved from the arithmetic books of Euclid.…”
Section: Testimonymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…sometimes corresponding almost word for word (e.g., V-12 and VII-12), does not necessarily imply that Book V was modeled after Book VII, because the coincidence may well be the result of later editorial work. Thus the arithmetic books are by no means a simple residue of the mathematics before the discovery of incommensurability (Vitrac 1990(Vitrac -2001. Thus, even if one admits the existence of "commensurable definition" of proportion in early development, its level of sophistication cannot be retrieved from the arithmetic books of Euclid.…”
Section: Testimonymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another caveat is that the Greek text of the Elements that we have now is considerably different from the original. Relative credibility of Arabo-Latin tradition, newly advocated by Knorr (1996) for Book XII, then by Rommevaux, Djebbar, and Vitrac (2001) for Book X, has turned out to be the case also for Book V by Acerbi (2003). Though I hope that inauthenticity of some parts of the Greek text would not essentially affect my arguments, one should now be careful of any argument that depends heavily on some small piece of text in the Elements.…”
Section: Book V Of the Elements: Separation From Book Vimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), il semble avoir perdu de vue l'origine eutocienne du texte grec qui nous est parvenu. 70 V. [Rommevaux, S., Djebbar, A., Vitrac, B., 2001]. 71 Dans ce qui suit j'utilise l'abréviation [Gérard Cr., Busard, 1984].…”
Section: B Les Arguments Aristotéliciens De Style Mathématiqueunclassified
“…45-47. 123 V. par exemple[Rommevaux, S., Djebbar, A., Vitrac, B., 2001], en particulier pp. 254-255 et p. 278.…”
unclassified