2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(20000131)417:1<49::aid-cne4>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remodeling of hippocampal synapses after hippocampus-dependent associative learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, there may be an increase in the size of climbing fiber-interpositus neuron synapses. Increases in postsynaptic density size occur in the synapses within CA1 stratum radiatum of rabbits trained in trace eyeblink conditioning (Geinisman et al, 2000), which is consistent with the training-related potentiation of the CA1 dendritic field potential (Power, Thompson, Moyer, & Disterhoft, 1997). A third possible structural substrate of increased olivonuclear synaptic efficacy is the proliferation of multiple synapse boutons, which has been reported in the visual cortex (Jones, Klintsova, Kilman, Sirevaag, & Greenough, 1997) and cerebellar cortex (Federmeier, Kleim, & Greenough, 2002) of rats, and in the hippocampus of rabbits (Geinisman, Berry, Disterhoft, Power, & Van der Zee, 2001) after learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Second, there may be an increase in the size of climbing fiber-interpositus neuron synapses. Increases in postsynaptic density size occur in the synapses within CA1 stratum radiatum of rabbits trained in trace eyeblink conditioning (Geinisman et al, 2000), which is consistent with the training-related potentiation of the CA1 dendritic field potential (Power, Thompson, Moyer, & Disterhoft, 1997). A third possible structural substrate of increased olivonuclear synaptic efficacy is the proliferation of multiple synapse boutons, which has been reported in the visual cortex (Jones, Klintsova, Kilman, Sirevaag, & Greenough, 1997) and cerebellar cortex (Federmeier, Kleim, & Greenough, 2002) of rats, and in the hippocampus of rabbits (Geinisman, Berry, Disterhoft, Power, & Van der Zee, 2001) after learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A stereologic disector technique was used to measure synapse density (West and Gundersen, 1990;Geinisman et al, 2000). Each disector consisted of micrographs of two adjacent ultrathin sections, a reference section and a look-up section immediately above it.…”
Section: Assessment Of Synapse Number By Electron Microscopementioning
confidence: 82%
“…For example, contrary to conditioning of the eyeblink response, the development of more complex motor skills involving coordinated limb movements is not associated with changes in synapse number within deep cerebellar nuclei (20). In addition, trace eyeblink conditioning was associated with an increase in the area of synaptic contacts within the hippocampus but not an overall increase in synapse number (31). Thus, memory may be encoded via several mechanisms that coalesce in different ways across multiple brain regions (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%