Remote Control of Quality Using Ethernet Vision and Web-enabled Robotic System

Kwon, Yongjin; Rauniar, Shreepud; Chiou, Richard; Sosa, Horacio

doi:10.1177/1063293x06063840

Cited by 14 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Quaisquer alterações nas especificações do produto e rotinas de controle da qualidade podem ser atualizadas instantaneamente e verificada, aumentando a eficiência global de produção (KWON et al, 2006;TSENG;ABDALLA;SHEHAB, 2006). Shao et al (2006) desenvolveram um sistema colaborativo de gerenciamento da qualidade, chamado CQMS (Collaborative Quality Management System), para melhorar a eficiência em analisar e diagnosticar problemas de qualidade em diferentes estágios do desenvolvimento do produto.…”

Section: Recursosunclassified

Integração Funcional Entre O Desenvolvimento De Produto E a Qualidade – Uma Revisão Bibliográfica

Bueno¹,

Toledo²

2017

Blucher Design Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO O Processo de Desenvolvimento de Produtos (PDP) situa-se na interface entre a empresa e o mercado e seu desempenho requer integração entre as áreas funcionais envolvidas a fim Área: Gestão do Processo de Desenvolvimento de Produtos INTRODUÇÃOOs serviços e produtos, geralmente, são as primeiras percepções dos clientes, por isso o sucesso de uma organização está diretamente ligado à capacidade de inovação, de desenvolver novos produtos e de entregá-los dentro dos padrões de qualidade esperados (ROZENFELD et al., 2006;JING;YANG, 2009;TULI;SHANKAR, 2014;BAUER et al., 2014;BAI et al., 2017). Os clientes estão cada vez mais exigentes, criando, assim, um ambiente competitivo exigindo que as organizações busquem dimensões de desempenho mais complexas, como qualidade e inovação. Assim, a qualidade, como vantagem competitiva e estratégia de negócio, torna-se um elemento essencial, em que as empresas devem cumprir exigências dos clientes no desenvolvimento de produto (KURNIATI; YEH; LIN, 2015). Estatísticas mostram que aproximadamente 80% dos problemas de qualidade resultam de falhas na concepção e projeto do produto, fases essenciais na determinação da qualidade do produto final, deixando evidente a importância do processo de desenvolvimento de produto para a competitividade (ROZENFELD et al., 2006;JING;YANG, 2009;CHAN;IP;CHEN;WEN, 2012; KOCK et al., 2013, MARINI et al., 2015LUNDGREN;HEDLIND;KJELLBERG, 2015).A maioria dos problemas de qualidade ou defeitos do produto são difíceis ou até mesmo impossíveis de serem corrigidos nas últimas fases do desenvolvimento do produto, isto é, na fase de produção. Assim, durante todas as fases do desenvolvimento do produto, a qualidade é

show abstract

Section: Recursosunclassified

Integração Funcional Entre O Desenvolvimento De Produto E a Qualidade – Uma Revisão Bibliográfica

Bueno¹,

Toledo²

2017

Blucher Design Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The formation of teams to carry out the analysis of failures can present difficulties in the interactions among the members, inefficient leadership and lack of collaboration (BANGHART; BABSKI-REEVES; BIAN, 2016) due to inconsistent and discrepant information exchanges prejudicing the analyzes (CHAO; ISHII, 2007; between them, which can lead to better problem solving (LEENDERS;WIERENGA, 2002;GRAY;SIEMSEN;VASUDEVA, 2015). On the other hand, the use of Information Technology (IT) improves and accelerates the sending and receiving of information since it makes the product development team available to collaborate and coordinate from anywhere at any time (BANKER; BARDHAN;ASDEMIR, 2006;KWON et al, 2006;TSENG;ABDALLA;SHEHAB, 2006;REID et al, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of DFMEA in the integration between product development and quality engineering: cases in large companies

Bueno¹,

Toledo²,

Silva³

2019

Product (São Carlos, Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increasing trend of product recalls is due to quality implications in the early stages of the Product Development Process (PDP) and could be prevented through preventive measures from the quality management system such as Design Failure Modes Analysis and Effects (DFMEA), one of the main tools of Quality Engineering. Besides the quality of products, functional integration is also considered one of the ways in which companies respond to competitive pressures. Thus, in the search for best practices to organize and manage product development, this article aims to examine the role of DFMEA in the context of functional integration between Product Development (PD) and Quality Engineering (QE) through case studies in two Brazilian industrial companies. The companies differ in the physical proximity between these departments, where one case PD and QE are co-located and the other are located in different cities and states. The results point that the use of integration practices such as Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and co-location during a DFMEA and despite the advancement of ICTs, co-location has indicated that it is a relevant mechanism to improve problem solving, due to the detail of the information and dynamism of the discussion meetings of failures and solutions. In addition, companies link the compensation system of employees to the failure rates of the new product in the market and the costs of non-quality boosting communication and collaboration between teams. In one of the cases, the integration is also facilitated by the PD and QE activities and the DFMEA reports are reported to the same manager.

show abstract

“…The laboratory component is central to the course and is available to the students outside of normal class time. The Web-based system allows robotics and automation to communicate, share design data, information and knowledge through the Internet [21][22] . This allows the students the freedom to explore the concepts of each lesson without time constraints inhibiting learning.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet Based Robotics And Mechatronics Experiments For Remote Laboratory Development

Chiou¹,

Kwon²,

Rauniar³

et al.

2007 Annual Conference &Amp; Exposition Proceedings

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes a series of laboratory experiments in Internet-based robotics and mechatronics, as well as the design, development, and evaluation of an Internetbased laboratory facility to be used to deliver an undergraduate laboratory course for engineering and engineering technology education. Internet-based robotics and mechatronics can be utilized in a wide range of curricula in both engineering and engineering technology programs. Educators are faced with the challenge of providing students with an adequate laboratory experience that will better prepare students for a corporate world where the need for engineers in the quality, service, and information technology industries is increasing. The uniqueness of the newly developed facility is its modularity in design and the use of commercially available hardware and software technologies. The laboratory consists of Yamaha Robots and machine vision systems, Allen Bradley PLC modules, Webcams and sensors, a data acquisition system, mechanical systems, and software applications for monitoring and control. Using this system, one can quickly use an experimental setup for an application problem, view and program the robots, and control robotic and mechanical motions remotely through the World Wide Web. The use of modern sensors and data acquisition instrumentation for monitoring and control of such an application is also beneficial as laboratory practices for undergraduate classes on Web-based gauging, measurement, inspection, diagnostic system, and quality control. The Internet-based approach for laboratory development and educational enhancement has been introduced in universities 15-20. Drexel University's Applied Engineering Technology Program received a NSF CCLI grant (2004-2007) to develop laboratory courses in Internet-based robotics and automation. In conjunction with the grant, the course, MET 205 Robotics & Mechatronics, has been developed and offered at Drexel University. This course provides a requisite understanding of Internet-based robotics/automation/machine vision for students to progress to the advanced level in the

show abstract

Remote Control of Quality Using Ethernet Vision and Web-enabled Robotic System

Cited by 14 publications

References 29 publications

Integração Funcional Entre O Desenvolvimento De Produto E a Qualidade – Uma Revisão Bibliográfica

Integração Funcional Entre O Desenvolvimento De Produto E a Qualidade – Uma Revisão Bibliográfica

The role of DFMEA in the integration between product development and quality engineering: cases in large companies

Internet Based Robotics And Mechatronics Experiments For Remote Laboratory Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About