2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)32135-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Maintenance of Agricultural Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AGRIX involved two research units and eight industrial firms (öhman et al, 2004;Oksanen et al, 2004). This case study focuses on one of the research units -the one that had the main responsibility for developing the automation system.…”
Section: Project Background and Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AGRIX involved two research units and eight industrial firms (öhman et al, 2004;Oksanen et al, 2004). This case study focuses on one of the research units -the one that had the main responsibility for developing the automation system.…”
Section: Project Background and Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to Forestry 4.0 applications CAN can be seen as the base protocol provider of data for information and decision-making, as in [30] and [31], where is developed a prototype for fault tolerance and remote maintenance over mobile networks for agricultural machinery equipped with ISOBUS, where the service provider could analyze the faults online based on the state information sent automatically by the machine controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Morris (1988), estimates of tractor maintenance and repair costs are important for tractor replacement decisions and for the farm's overall budget. This control can be done by means of field notebooks, daily reports or from a specific computer program (ÖHMAN et al, 2004;SOPEGNO et al, 2016). Thus, In addition, through the results obtained, due to the high technology embedded in an agricultural tractor, its operators need to be professionals trained constantly in the technical part and also motivated, able to participate in a bigger philosophy of the company in the search of high levels of efficiency (RALPH et al, 2012;BOCHTIS et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%