2012
DOI: 10.1109/jproc.2012.2196404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing and Earthquake Damage Assessment: Experiences, Limits, and Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows the impact of earthquake damage on two selected textural and structural features. Entropy, energy, dissimilarity, and homogeneity are all second order texture features derived from the GLCM that have been correlated with damage or used as proxies for damage in previous studies [35,[37][38][39]. In order to reduce dimensionality and eliminate redundancy, the two consistently correlated GLCM features of Entropy (a measure of gray level randomness) and Dissimilarity (a measure of gray level difference (the square of contrast)) were chosen as texture inputs.…”
Section: Texture and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the impact of earthquake damage on two selected textural and structural features. Entropy, energy, dissimilarity, and homogeneity are all second order texture features derived from the GLCM that have been correlated with damage or used as proxies for damage in previous studies [35,[37][38][39]. In order to reduce dimensionality and eliminate redundancy, the two consistently correlated GLCM features of Entropy (a measure of gray level randomness) and Dissimilarity (a measure of gray level difference (the square of contrast)) were chosen as texture inputs.…”
Section: Texture and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Split the gradient image into AˆB cells. For each cell, compute the histogram of gradient orientation by adding the magnitude of the gradient to its corresponding orientation bin.…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct manual field inspection is labor intensive, time consuming, and cannot assess the damages in inaccessible areas. Remote sensing technology is the most predominant and early source to provide data for performing such assessments, either manually or using automated image analysis procedures [1,2]. Various kinds of remote sensing data such as optical, synthetic aperture radar (SAR), and LiDAR are being used for the damage assessment process [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing is an effective tool for detecting damaged areas because it can be used to document damage to large areas without direct access to the affected area (Yamazaki and Matsuoka, 2007;Rathje and Adams, 2008;Dell'Acqua and Gamba, 2012). Immense improvement to the accessibility of remote-sensing imagery data and geospatial data processing tools has been achieved over the last several years (Vuolo et al, 2016;Korosov et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%