IEEE International IEEE International IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2004. IGARSS '04. Proceedings
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2004.1370330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing of frozen lakes on the north slope of Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If lake ice grows thick enough to completely ground to the lake bed, the C-band SAR backscatter intensity is low (−14 to −18 dB). Evaluating high or low C-band SAR backscatter from lake ice has become an established method for determining whether a lake retains floating ice all winter or if lake ice is frozen completely to the lake bed in arctic and subarctic lakes (Jeffries et al, 1996;French et al, 2004;White et al, 2008;Arp et al, 2012). After a thorough literature search, we could not find any detailed reports that characterized Lband calibrated SAR backscatter intensity from floating and grounded lake ice to follow the early potential that Elachi et al (1976) reported from L-band airborne radar.…”
Section: Engram Et Al: Characterization Of L-band Synthetic Apertmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If lake ice grows thick enough to completely ground to the lake bed, the C-band SAR backscatter intensity is low (−14 to −18 dB). Evaluating high or low C-band SAR backscatter from lake ice has become an established method for determining whether a lake retains floating ice all winter or if lake ice is frozen completely to the lake bed in arctic and subarctic lakes (Jeffries et al, 1996;French et al, 2004;White et al, 2008;Arp et al, 2012). After a thorough literature search, we could not find any detailed reports that characterized Lband calibrated SAR backscatter intensity from floating and grounded lake ice to follow the early potential that Elachi et al (1976) reported from L-band airborne radar.…”
Section: Engram Et Al: Characterization Of L-band Synthetic Apertmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The same phenomenon of high-backscatter return from floating ice and low return from grounded ice was observed in the early 1990s with the advent of calibrated spaceborne SAR, using the C-band VV microwave signal of ERS-1 and ERS-2 (Jeffries et al, 1994;Morris et al, 1995;French et al, 2004). Others have observed this difference using Radarsat-1 C-band HH data Hirose et al, 2008;Arp et al, 2011).…”
Section: Engram Et Al: Characterization Of L-band Synthetic Apertmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Our analysis matched these past findings, with frequent cloud gaps and sun glint artifacts in the Landsat and Sentinel 2 time series. SAR has also been found to better characterize lakes during ice cover compared to optical data [50,51], though accuracy declines once the lake fully freezes over [52][53][54] and it results in overestimation of water area due to specular reflection from a smooth surface. A hybrid approach incorporating optical and SAR data could help address this limitation during winter.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Sensors For Capturing Water Area and Water-...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods use the difference in backscatter between FI and BFI to identify threshold(s) capable of differentiating between the two types of ice cover. Approaches vary from applying a single threshold for binary classification to a variable threshold determined through interactive threshold algorithms according to the diversity of the SAR datasets involved (e.g., French et al 2004;Engram et al 2018) 2022). Our goal is to determine the lake ice regime (FI and BFI) for lakes in our study area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%