Remote sensor camera traps provide the first density estimate for the largest natural population of the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus)

Abstract

Context Accurate estimates of population size is fundamentally important for effective conservation management of threatened species. Remote sensor camera traps often capture cryptic species that are difficult to sight or capture. When animals are individually identifiable, camera traps can be used in conjunction with mark–recapture methods to provide a robust estimate of density. This has been effective for medium and large mammals such as felid and quoll species. Less is known about whether this may be an effective approach for smaller species. The numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus), a small diurnal marsupial once widespread across southern Australia, is now highly restricted. Low densities and crypsis make them challenging to survey, and current population monitoring methods (driving transects and sign surveys) do not provide accurate density estimates. Aims This study aimed to: (1) assess whether numbats can be individually identified using camera trap images; and (2) use spatial and non-spatial capture–recapture methods to investigate whether camera trapping is a viable population monitoring tool for numbats in the largest extant population. Methods We conducted spatial and non-spatial population modelling using images captured incidentally during a large camera-trapping project. Key results We found numbats could be individually identified by stripe patterns from camera images that, in conjunction with capture–recapture modelling, could provide a density estimate. From 6950 trap nights there were 116 numbat detections on 57 of 250 cameras. Of these, 61 detections were used to identify 29 individuals and provide a density estimate of 0.017 ha−1 ± 0.004 (CV = 0.26). This density applied across the estimated extent of distribution suggests a substantially larger numbat population in the Upper Warren, Western Australia (~1900 adults) than previously assumed. Conclusions Camera trapping is a potential method for monitoring the population density of small uniquely marked species, such as the numbat, and for monitoring population trends in response to conservation efforts such as introduced predator control and translocations, as well as management actions such as prescribed burning and timber harvesting. Implications This study contributes to the understanding of situations where camera traps can be utilised to survey small, cryptic species. To provide a more reliable density estimate, and to develop an optimal sampling layout for numbats, further studies would be required.

Use of carrion fly iDNA metabarcoding to monitor invasive and native mammals

“…This implies a degree of isolation. However, juvenile numbats and chuditch will begin to disperse to new habitats from December–January (Soderquist & Serena, 2000; Thorn et al., 2022), and it is probable that remnant vegetation along roadsides could act as corridors for this dispersal. The lack of detection of these species outside the conservation areas may not mean these species are completely absent from these areas and could instead reflect the limitations of our sampling method, such as the length of time of sampling, the sampling resolution, the lack of available carrion or feces as a food source, or that no animals were dispersing near where our samplers were located.…”

Affordable RFID loggers for monitoring animal movement, activity, and behaviour

“…While camera traps are useful for capture-mark recapture studies where individuals can be uniquely identified visually (e.g. numbats [ 39 ]), not all species possess distinct markings that allow them to be recognized. Additional problems can also arise from poor image quality and the misidentification of individuals [ 40 , 41 ].…”

Detection and density estimation for a cryptic species

“…Spatially explicit capture‐recapture (SECR) modelling using photographic identification is a popular technique for estimating densities of species with distinctive individual markings (Green et al., 2020). This method has been used with spotted or striped cats (Green et al., 2020), wolverines (Royle et al., 2011) and distinctive small Australian marsupials, including the sugar glider Petaurus notatus (Gracanin et al., 2022), northern quoll Dasyurus hallucatus (Hohnen et al., 2013) and numbat Myrmecobius fasciatus (Thorn et al., 2022). Unlike traditional capture‐recapture, SECR considers spatial variation in detection probability and records animal capture and recapture locations.…”