34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2004.1408586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote versus hands-on labs: a comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, relative effectiveness of remote labs versus hands on labs in mechanical engineering course on machine dynamics and mechanisms was evaluated and the results were encouraging since about 90% of the student rated in favor to remote lab approach compared to handson lab [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, relative effectiveness of remote labs versus hands on labs in mechanical engineering course on machine dynamics and mechanisms was evaluated and the results were encouraging since about 90% of the student rated in favor to remote lab approach compared to handson lab [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main features of simulators is their interactive capability. Interactive simulations are quickly gaining importance as a means to explore, comprehend and communicate complex ideas [12]- [13]. Interactive simulators can be implemented using a combination of computers, high-resolution graphics, simulation programming languages, and an Internet connection.…”
Section: Virtual Lab Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worthy to note what is reported in [8]; a study is conducted to evaluate remote labs and hands-on labs. This study claims that 90% of students see the remote lab as effective as or even better than the hands-on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the addition of new remote labs should not require any modification to the core modules, or worse, the architecture. As reported in many remote labs, the complexity associated with developing new remote labs or even maintaining existent remote labs is one of the major obstacles to the wide spread of remote labs [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%