2005
DOI: 10.1029/2004jc002338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remotely sensed winds for episodic forcing of ocean models

Abstract: [1] A new method is described for forcing regional ocean models with wind stress fields derived from satellite scatterometer data. A variational technique is applied to produce regularly gridded surface wind (stress) fields in time and space using data from the NASA SeaWinds scatterometer aboard the QuikSCAT satellite. Three uniformly gridded wind stress products are produced with satellite scatterometer data for the Gulf of Mexico, one based solely on scatterometer data and the other two constrained to a back… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is crucial for heat budget studies such as this one where the role of the oceanic processes and the thermodynamic response of the lowest layer of the atmosphere to SST changes need to be represented accurately. The model is forced here with the weekly mean scatterometer winds [Morey et al, 2005] along with climatological radiation from Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE), cloudiness from International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project, and precipitation from CPC Merged Analysis of Precipitation (CMAP) as by Murtugudde et al [1996].…”
Section: Model Description and Forcingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is crucial for heat budget studies such as this one where the role of the oceanic processes and the thermodynamic response of the lowest layer of the atmosphere to SST changes need to be represented accurately. The model is forced here with the weekly mean scatterometer winds [Morey et al, 2005] along with climatological radiation from Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE), cloudiness from International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project, and precipitation from CPC Merged Analysis of Precipitation (CMAP) as by Murtugudde et al [1996].…”
Section: Model Description and Forcingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wind fields used in the model are objectively gridded with dynamical constraints to blend NCEPR 2 and H*Wind fields (see Morey et al (2005) for more details on the objective gridding technique). In simplified terms, the gridded wind product largely matches the high-resolution observationally derived H*Wind fields within several hundred kilometers of the center of the hurricane, and farther away, the coarser-resolution (2.5°) NCEPR 2 data are mostly used to complete the fields.…”
Section: Estimates Of Maximum Storm Tidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wind fields are constructed for the time period 00:00 UTC 8 July-23:00 10 July UTC 2005, by applying an objective gridding method (Morey et al 2005) to combine data from the NOAA AOML Hurricane Research Division Wind Analyses (H*Wind fields, Powell et al 1998) and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Reanalysis II (NCEPR2) winds. Stress is calculated on the basis of bulk aerodynamic formulae with a Large et al (1994) drag coefficient as in Morey et al (2005). The H*Wind fields provide 1-min maximum sustained winds over a region centered about the hurricane on a 6-km grid roughly 960 km by 960 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we again use a C DA of 0.002, which is perhaps a bit high for fast winds (see, e.g., Morey et al, 2005), but is adequate for a slightly unstable atmosphere such as the one above the warm Agulhas Current. The above choice of stress is supported by several other studies.…”
Section: A Present Day Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%