Removal of Ammonia on Catfish Processing Wastewater using Horizontal Sub-Surface Flow Constructed Wetland (HSSFCW)

Marlena, Bekti; Yuliasni, Rustiana; Sartamtomo, Sartamtomo

doi:10.21771/jrtppi.2018.v9.no1.p15-21

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Most wetland units degrade nutrient-type pollutants such as ammonia, phosphorus, and residual organic substances from previous processing (Geovana et al, 2016;Moenir et al, 2014;Marlena et al, 2018;Setianingsih et al, 2021). However, the high concentration of oil & grease pollutants and MBAS will be more effectively degraded under aerobic conditions (Primasari et al, 2011).…”

Section: Performance Of Removal Pollutantmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Domestic and industrial wastewater generally contains high amounts of organic substances that potentially emit carbon emissions. Therefore, several technologies have been applied in treating both industrial and domestic WWTP wastewater there are chemicalphysical (Mukimin et al, 2017;Vistanty et al, 2015;Crisnaningtyas and Vistanty, 2016), aerobic-anaerobic treatment (Yuliasni et al, 2017;Novarina et al, 2020), and wetlands (Moenir et al, 2014;Marlena et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of the Implementation Integrated Biological System Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant: Pollutant Removal, Operational Maintenance, Estimation of Carbon Emission

Setianingsih

Crisnaningtyas

Purwanto

et al. 2022

j.ris.technol.pencegah.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of WWTP in business activities needs to pay attention to getting appropriate WWTP that is more valuable to support sustainable development. This study aims to evaluate two systems of integrated biological WWTP; anaerobic-wetland, and anaerobic-aerobic-wetland, including the effectiveness of pollutant removal, operational and maintenance, and estimation of carbon emissions. The performance of pollutant removal was evaluated by analyzing inlet and outlet samples of WWTP. An operational and maintenance evaluation was carried out by studying the WWTP operating system and maintenance procedures supported by a literature review. Carbon emission estimation was carried out using a formula referring to the IPCC Guidelines (2006). Organic matter removal of anaerobic-aerobic-wetland WWTP in the form of BOD₅ and COD are 92.12% and 91.72%, respectively, higher than anaerobic-wetland WWTP are 88.69% of BOD₅ and 77.62% of COD. Anaerobic-aerobic-wetland WWTP needs more maintenance and operation than anaerobic-wetland WWTP. The highest carbon emission of both WWTP is 41530.91 kgCO₂ eq/year of anaerobic-wetland WWTP from the organic matter removal process and 46485.15 kgCO₂ eq/year of anaerobic-aerobic-wetland WWTP. Electrical energy consumption emits in anaerobic-aerobic-wetland WWTP is 22338 kgCO₂ eq/year higher than anaerobic-wetland WWTP at 4299.70 kgCO₂ eq/year. Total carbon emissions of anaerobic-wetland WWTP is 47404.58 kgCO₂ eq/year and anaerobic-aerobic-wetland WWTP is 68900.23 kgCO₂ eq/year.

show abstract

Section: Performance Of Removal Pollutantmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Implementation Integrated Biological System Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant: Pollutant Removal, Operational Maintenance, Estimation of Carbon Emission

Setianingsih

Crisnaningtyas

Purwanto

et al. 2022

j.ris.technol.pencegah.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Lahan basah buatan (constructed wetland) adalah sistem yang dirancang dan dibangun dengan memanfaatkan proses alami yang melibatkan vegetasi lahan basah, tanah, dan mikroba untuk membantu pengolahan air limbah (7) . Kemampuan penurunan Nitrogen industri pengolahan lele di unit wetland telah dibahas tersendiri secara spesifik di mana kemampuan penurunan ammonia di wetland mencapai 87,34% (8) , Kemampuan wetland dalam menurunkan ammonia, nitrat dan nitrit di beberapa industry juga telah dibahas dalam paper yang ditulis oleh Lamchaturapatr dan Vymazal (9; 10) .…”

Section: Latar Belakangunclassified

Pengolahan Limbah Industri Pengolahan Ikan Dengan Teknologi Gabungan Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB)-Wetland

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB)-Wetland Integrated Technology was applied to treating fish-processing wastewater, taking into account for its simplicity, rapid and economical as well as its capability for reducing pollutant, so the effluent can fulfill effluent standard regulation. The research was carried out by the following steps: identification of wastewater characteristics, WWTP design and construction, and WWTP operational trials. The trials showed that UASB could remove COD average 72.3% and could achieve the highest COD removal of 95.42%, with retention time 24 hours. Wetland could remove COD 52.9% on average and the highest COD removal was 78.22%. Simultaneously UASB-Wetland hybrid Technology could remove 86.25% COD on average, and the highest COD removal was 98.58%. Effluent has compiled the stream standard regulation and can be reused for fish farming.Keywords: fish processing wastewater, high organic wastewater treatment, integrated UASB-Wetland, Anaerobic-Aerobic WWTPABSTRAKTeknologi gabungan Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) - wetland diaplikasikan untuk mengolah air limbah industri pengolahan ikan dengan pertimbangan bahwa teknologi ini murah dan mudah pengoperasiannya serta dapat mereduksi polutan sehingga kualitas effluent memenuhi syarat baku mutu. Instalasi pengolahan limbah terdiri dari unit ekualisasi, UASB dan wetland. Hasil uji coba pengolahan dengan UASB menujukkan bahwa penurunan COD rata-rata 72,3% dengan persen penurunan tertinggi mencapai 95,42% dan penurunan COD dengan proses wetland rata-rata 52,9% dengan penurunan tertinggi mencapai 78,22%. Secara keseluruhan proses IPAL hibrid UASB-Wetland mampu menurunkan nilai COD rata-rata sebesar 86,25% dengan penurunan tertinggi mencapai 98,58%. Limbah terolah (effluent) sudah memenuhi baku mutu yang disyaratkan serta dapat dimanfaatkan kembali (reuse) sebagai sumber air untuk budidaya perikanan darat.Kata kunci: air limbah pengolahan ikan, pengolahan limbah organik tinggi, gabungan UASB-wetland, IPAL anaerobik-aerobik

show abstract

“…In addition, subsurface flow constructed wetland provides the additional advantage of minimization of odor problems 23 . Recently, many studies have demonstrated the efficiency of constructed wetlands for food processing wastewater treatment such as catfish processing wastewater, 24 slaughterhouse wastewater, 23 bulk milk cooling tank, 19 olive mill wastewater, 20,25 fish processing plant, 26 abattoir effluents, 27 palm oil extraction process, 21 dairy wastewater, 1,8,10,28,29 coffee processing, 30,31 and fruit and vegetation processing plant 32 . However, at the best of our knowledge, the treatment of real industrial dairy wastewater via horizontal subsurface flow‐constructed wetlands without any pretreatment has not been widely reported.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Green sustainable technology for biotreatment of actual dairy wastewater in constructed wetland

Mohammed

Ismail

2020

J of Chemical Tech & Biotech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND Due to the environmental problems caused by food processing wastewaters and their complex and expensive treatment methods, it becomes mandatory to seek a sound, sustainable and environmentally friendly solution such as constructed wetland (CW). This study aimed to investigate the potential of treating real dairy wastewater in CW. Six horizontal subsurface flow CW microcosms were set up using different conventional and cost‐effective supporting media, which were gravel, soil and sand. All the CWs were fueled continuously with real fresh dairy wastewater. Five of the six CW microcosms were planted with Canna indica. The remaining CW microcosm was kept unplanted and was considered as a control microcosm. RESULTS The results revealed significant removal efficiencies of organic matter (as chemical oxygen demand) up to 89.92%, 97.6%, 95.8%, 97.2%, 97.3% and 98.2%, for CW1, CW2, CW3, CW4, CW5 and CW6, respectively. Also, high removal efficiencies of ammonium were observed in the range of 98.4–82.0%, whereas removal efficiencies of total suspended solids were in the range of 99.2–93.4%. CONCLUSION The results demonstrated that the dominant mechanisms for organics and ammonium removal were biodegradation processes. These promising results confirmed the validity of using constructed wetland as a sustainable cost‐effective approach for dairy wastewater treatment. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry

show abstract

Removal of Ammonia on Catfish Processing Wastewater using Horizontal Sub-Surface Flow Constructed Wetland (HSSFCW)

Cited by 6 publications

References 22 publications

Evaluation of the Implementation Integrated Biological System Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant: Pollutant Removal, Operational Maintenance, Estimation of Carbon Emission

Evaluation of the Implementation Integrated Biological System Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant: Pollutant Removal, Operational Maintenance, Estimation of Carbon Emission

Pengolahan Limbah Industri Pengolahan Ikan Dengan Teknologi Gabungan Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB)-Wetland

Green sustainable technology for biotreatment of actual dairy wastewater in constructed wetland

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About