1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(97)86722-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of direct red and acid brilliant blue by adsorption on to banana pith

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
140
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 322 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
140
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, ion removal was difficult, which corroborates the results of pseudo-second order model and the values of the E) obtained by the mathematical model of Dubinin-Radushkevich. Namasivayam 43 determined that low rates of desorption suggest a chemisorption process as the primary mode of pollutant removal by the adsorbent. Therefore, the percentage desorbed cannot be considered satisfactory for a possible reuse of this biosorbent for new adsorption processes.…”
Section: Desorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, ion removal was difficult, which corroborates the results of pseudo-second order model and the values of the E) obtained by the mathematical model of Dubinin-Radushkevich. Namasivayam 43 determined that low rates of desorption suggest a chemisorption process as the primary mode of pollutant removal by the adsorbent. Therefore, the percentage desorbed cannot be considered satisfactory for a possible reuse of this biosorbent for new adsorption processes.…”
Section: Desorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from the figure that the percentage removal initially increases very sharply with the increase in adsorbent dosage, but beyond a value of 25 g/L, the percentage removal reaches an almost constant value. This may be due to an overlapping of adsorption sites as a result of over-crowding of adsorbent particles (Namasivayam et al, 1998). The percentage removal of Pb 2+ increased from 68.4 to 92.4%, 65.8 to 91.1% and 63.1 to 89.6% for the three different initial concentrations of 100, 300 and 500 mg/L, respectively, with an increase in the adsorbent doses from 5 g/l to 35 g/l at room temperature (25 o C) and pH 5.5.…”
Section: Effect Of Adsorbent Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, a number of workers have used different waste materials. They have studied the feasibility of using low cost materials, such as waste orange peel [6] , banana pith [7] , cotton waste, rice husk [8] , betonite clay [9] , neem leaf powder, [10] powdered activated sludge, perlite [11] , bamboo dust, coconut shell, groundnut shell, rice husk and straw, duck weed [12] , sewage sludge [13] , sawdust carbon [14] and gram husk [15] , coal bottom ash [16][17][18] , bagasse fly ash [19] , blast furnace slag [20] , deoiled soya [21,22] , red mud [23] and sawdust [24] as adsorbents for removal of various dyes from wastewaters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%