2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of microbial biofilm on Water Hyacinth plants roots by ultrasonic treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29 Kirzhner et al investigated 20 kHz-ultrasound efficiency to remove microbial biofilm in waste water with heterotrophic aerobic bacteria and demonstrated that ultrasound treatment is effective in removing biofilm by more than two orders of magnitude. 25 Phull et al showed that ultrasound is suitable for water desinfection, whereas ultrasound at high frequencies seemed to be more effective with regards to bactericidal effects. 30 Nishikawa et al demonstrated that Staphylococcus mutans biofilm can be effectively removed by ultrasonic exposure 31 in an in vivo model, and Xu et al demonstrated that high-intensity focused ultrasound is able to destroy Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…29 Kirzhner et al investigated 20 kHz-ultrasound efficiency to remove microbial biofilm in waste water with heterotrophic aerobic bacteria and demonstrated that ultrasound treatment is effective in removing biofilm by more than two orders of magnitude. 25 Phull et al showed that ultrasound is suitable for water desinfection, whereas ultrasound at high frequencies seemed to be more effective with regards to bactericidal effects. 30 Nishikawa et al demonstrated that Staphylococcus mutans biofilm can be effectively removed by ultrasonic exposure 31 in an in vivo model, and Xu et al demonstrated that high-intensity focused ultrasound is able to destroy Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19] The ability of ultrasonic cavitation to destroy biofilm extracellular matrix in a mechanical fashion, and remove bacterial cells from the surface has been studied and described in many studies. [20][21][22][23][24][25] Intensity and treatment time is currently the subject of debate. Moreover, there is scant literature on the specific use of this treatment modality in the context of arthroplasty-related infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four root segments (approximately 2 cm in length and 0.3–0.5 cm in thickness) were obtained from each plant system. Subsequently, the root segments were washed by shaking three times in 10 ml of tap water, twice in 10 ml of distilled water, and once in 20 ml of sterile 0.85% NaCl ( Kirzhner et al, 2009 ; Li et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were filtered through sterile mixed esters of cellulose membranes (S-Pak Membrane Filters, 47 mm diameter, 0.22 μm pore size, Millipore Corporation, Billerica, United States). The filters obtained were placed on 2% Nutrient (Difco-BD, Sparks, United States) and R2A (Lab M, Lancashire, United Kingdom) agar media and plates were incubated for 48 h at 25 and 37°C, respectively ( Calheiros et al, 2009 ; Kirzhner et al, 2009 ). An aliquot of the samples (50 μl) was also directly spread without filtering on the surface of each medium and incubated in the same conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cleaning ability of HPU has been widely demonstrated to remove sediment from food (Zhao et al, 2009), plants (Kirzhner, Zimmels, Malkovskaja, & Starosvetsky, 2009) and membrane filters (Muthukumaran et al, 2005). One significant problem with this technology is an ability to induce surface erosion of stainless steel (Haosheng, Jiadao, & Darong, 2009), cleaning tanks (Krefting, Mettin, & Lauterborn, 2004) and ultrasonic sonotrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%