1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(98)00063-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of natural organic matter from two types of humic ground waters by nanofiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5). These results are comparable to previous results found to nanofiltration membranes (Alborzfar et al, 1998), with the advantage of using microfiltration and a gravitational system, much more cheaper than a nanofiltration system using pumps. Fig.…”
Section: Doc and Uv 254 Rejection Capacitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…5). These results are comparable to previous results found to nanofiltration membranes (Alborzfar et al, 1998), with the advantage of using microfiltration and a gravitational system, much more cheaper than a nanofiltration system using pumps. Fig.…”
Section: Doc and Uv 254 Rejection Capacitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Both methods gave good results; however, NF membranes have several advantages from the point of view of health aspects and lower investment costs. Removal of natural organic matter (NOM) and disinfection by-product (DBP) precursors were also studied [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Jacangelo et al [11] reported that both RO and NF are used in the US for removal of NOM.…”
Section: Ground Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NF has been widely used in aqueous systems such as water treatment for removal of organic matter [5][6][7], recovery of lactic acid from fermentation broth [8], and concentration of aqueous solutions containing antibiotics [9][10][11][12]. Typically, the nominal molecular weight cut-off of NF membranes ranges from 200 to 1,000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%