2020
DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2020.1786696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Phloridzin by Chitosan-Modified Biochar Prepared from Apple Branches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies also reported similar enhanced findings. For example, CS@BC exhibited nearly twice more phloridzin sorption than the BC produced from apple branches at 300 °C (Ma et al 2021); nearly 2.5 times more Cd(II) sorption than the BC produced from bamboo at 900 °C (Huang et al 2022), and nearly 3 times more Pb(II) sorption than the BC produced from pine wood at 425 °C (Dewage et al 2018).…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies also reported similar enhanced findings. For example, CS@BC exhibited nearly twice more phloridzin sorption than the BC produced from apple branches at 300 °C (Ma et al 2021); nearly 2.5 times more Cd(II) sorption than the BC produced from bamboo at 900 °C (Huang et al 2022), and nearly 3 times more Pb(II) sorption than the BC produced from pine wood at 425 °C (Dewage et al 2018).…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As found in the present study, the adsorption capacity for MO of CSBC (38.75 mg.g −1 ) was close to 1.3 times greater than BC (31.63 mg.g −1 ). Several studies that were conducted on chitosan-modified different raw materials of biochar, such as peels of pomelo [56], apple branches [39], pine wood [43] and corncob [57], have shown that the use of chitosan-modified biochar also contributed to the overall adsorption performance, as listed in Table 3. Although the adsorption capacity of CSBC does not seem to be significantly improved regarding RHB as compared with other studies (Table 3), it is true that no safe comparisons can be made here because the feedstock used, the pyrolytic temperature, the experimental conditions and target substrates are totally different.…”
Section: Mechanism Exploration and Comparison Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, chitosan can be utilized as an organic glue to attach pollutants on the surface of biochar and thus, the adsorption capacities of biochar modified by chitosan to various pollutants are generally improved [38]. For example, chitosan-coated onto biochar surfaces showed an adsorption capacity for phloridzin (28.96 mg.g −1 ), nearly double the unmodified biochar derived from apple branches (15.93 mg.g −1 ) [39]. Additionally, the modification of chitosan on biochar surface has been shown to have greater adsorption capacities for Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions than unmodified biochar [40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%