2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.02.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Plutonium from Contaminated Soil by Chemical Leaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A rehabilitated soil subsequent to the leaching usually contains 50-80% of the original contaminated soil mass, which depends on the level of soil contamination and the transporting cost of the waste generated in the landfill. A chemical soil leaching technology has enabled a very high remediation efficiency of a wide range of heavy metal compounds, including plutonium from a radioactive waste (Xu et al, 2016). Since soil leaching is cost-efficient only in smaller areas, this technology is primarily intended for a severely contaminated agricultural land.…”
Section: Radočaj Et Al: the Remediation Of Agricultural Land Contmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rehabilitated soil subsequent to the leaching usually contains 50-80% of the original contaminated soil mass, which depends on the level of soil contamination and the transporting cost of the waste generated in the landfill. A chemical soil leaching technology has enabled a very high remediation efficiency of a wide range of heavy metal compounds, including plutonium from a radioactive waste (Xu et al, 2016). Since soil leaching is cost-efficient only in smaller areas, this technology is primarily intended for a severely contaminated agricultural land.…”
Section: Radočaj Et Al: the Remediation Of Agricultural Land Contmentioning
confidence: 99%