1984
DOI: 10.1097/00005344-198400067-00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renal Effects of Nitrendipine Monotherapy in Essential Hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Short-term administration of nifedipine to normotensive subjects or hypertensive patients produced a significant increase in plasma renin activity (Aoki et al, 1976;Pedersen et al, 1979;Hiramatsu et al, 1982;Kusano et al, 1982;Leonetti et al, 1982;Kiowski et al, 1983). Results for plasma RAS components were inconsistent after treatment with nitrendipine (Thananopavarn et al, 1984;Luft et al, 1985;Pedrinelli et al, 1986), nicardipine (van Schaik et al, 1984;Elliott et al, 1985), amlodipine (Krenek et al, 2004;Lamarre-Cliche et al, 2005), or verapamil (Muiesan et al, 1982;Guthrie et al, 1983;Frohlich, 1985). Some calcium blockers such as azelnidipine may suppress the RAS although its mechanism remains unclear (Oizumi et al, 1989).…”
Section: Calcium Blockersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short-term administration of nifedipine to normotensive subjects or hypertensive patients produced a significant increase in plasma renin activity (Aoki et al, 1976;Pedersen et al, 1979;Hiramatsu et al, 1982;Kusano et al, 1982;Leonetti et al, 1982;Kiowski et al, 1983). Results for plasma RAS components were inconsistent after treatment with nitrendipine (Thananopavarn et al, 1984;Luft et al, 1985;Pedrinelli et al, 1986), nicardipine (van Schaik et al, 1984;Elliott et al, 1985), amlodipine (Krenek et al, 2004;Lamarre-Cliche et al, 2005), or verapamil (Muiesan et al, 1982;Guthrie et al, 1983;Frohlich, 1985). Some calcium blockers such as azelnidipine may suppress the RAS although its mechanism remains unclear (Oizumi et al, 1989).…”
Section: Calcium Blockersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding suggests a sustained postdose natriuretic or diuretic effect, possibly outbalanced by a counteracting sodium-retaining state during the subsequent hours, resulting in a net unchanged 24-hour excretion. 3 ' l7~19 Isradipine induced an increased outflow of fluid from the proximal tubules, although no change in the rate of absolute proximal reabsorption of sodium was seen for the group as a whole. Nevertheless, there was a significant relationship between the degree of changes in absolute rate of proximal sodium reabsorption and changes in SBP, MBP, and DBP (see Table 2 and Figure 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, there was no exaggerated hypotensive response which could have offset an initial diuretic effect. Short-term treatment with calcium entry blockers was found to produce a moderately negative sodium balance in hypertensive patients in various other studies, but the reported effects on GFR differ from no change (de Leeuw and Brinkenhager 1984; Tananopavan et al 1985) to an increase (Baba et al 1987), as found by ourselves. Steele (1987) showed that the rise in GFR after calcium entry blockade was accentuated in isolated, perfused kidneys of spontaneous hypertensive rats, and in the kidneys of salt-sensitive Dahl rats as compared to those of salt-resistent animals.…”
Section: Different Effect In Hypertensivesmentioning
confidence: 54%