1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.1998.tb01944.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renal functional reserve in insulin dependent diabetic children

Abstract: Background: Microalbuminuria has been shown to be predictive for clinical diabetic nephropathy. Renal functional reserve (RFR), as a response to protein loading in a short period of time, is a parameter to assess the ability of kidneys to increase the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The aim of this study was to predict the early phase of diabetic nephropathy by measuring urinary albumin level and RFR capacity in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Methodr:Twenty-two patients with lDDM w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the microalbuminuric SSc patients showed a statistically significant negative association with baseline GFR and RFR. The latter was predictive of subclinical renal disease in 24/30 (80%) SSc patients compared to 8/30 (26.7%) using microalbuminuria, and such wide discrepancy was reported in previous studies that concluded the detection of abnormal RFR in diabetic patients with or without microalbuminuria is more sensitive than microalbuminuria in assessing the early phase of diabetic nephropathy [22,37]. Also, the timed urine collections being the standard for detecting microalbuminuria are considered cumbersome, inconvenient, and subjected to collection inaccuracies being a limiting factor in contrary to GFR and RFR estimation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In the current study, the microalbuminuric SSc patients showed a statistically significant negative association with baseline GFR and RFR. The latter was predictive of subclinical renal disease in 24/30 (80%) SSc patients compared to 8/30 (26.7%) using microalbuminuria, and such wide discrepancy was reported in previous studies that concluded the detection of abnormal RFR in diabetic patients with or without microalbuminuria is more sensitive than microalbuminuria in assessing the early phase of diabetic nephropathy [22,37]. Also, the timed urine collections being the standard for detecting microalbuminuria are considered cumbersome, inconvenient, and subjected to collection inaccuracies being a limiting factor in contrary to GFR and RFR estimation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In macroalbuminuric patients, RFR was found to be positive but decreased [14], positive in patients with GFR above 60 ml.min-1.1.73m2-1 and negative in patients with GFR below 60 ml.min-1.1.73m2-1 [14] or absent [19]. In studies where albuminuria was not defined or the groups of the patients were nonhomogeneous, RFR was found to be positive but decreased [21][22][23] or negative [24]. There are several possible explanations for the inconsistency of RFR results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further reason for inconsistent results is that the groups of patients studied were not homogeneous, defined for example only by diabetes duration [23] or differing in presence of retinopathy or concomitant drug therapy [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%