1990
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199004000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renal Hemodynamic Effects of Contrast Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 demonstrates the time course and variability of renal vascular responsiveness between intrarenal, intraarterial (thoracic aorta), and intravenous bolus injection of ionic and nonionic RCM in the dog. These observed renal vascular effects of RCM are also supported by other investigators (Caldicott et al, 1970;Morris et al, 1978;Norby and DiBona, 1975;Talner and Davidson, 1968). Similar observations were made in both femoral blood flow and RBF before and after the administration of both high-and low-osmolar RCM ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 3 demonstrates the time course and variability of renal vascular responsiveness between intrarenal, intraarterial (thoracic aorta), and intravenous bolus injection of ionic and nonionic RCM in the dog. These observed renal vascular effects of RCM are also supported by other investigators (Caldicott et al, 1970;Morris et al, 1978;Norby and DiBona, 1975;Talner and Davidson, 1968). Similar observations were made in both femoral blood flow and RBF before and after the administration of both high-and low-osmolar RCM ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 88%
“…An overall schematic representation integrating these factors and the resulting consequences of RCM administration is summarized in Figure 2. Of these factors, the magnitude of RCM osmolality is central to both the acute hemodynamic and tubular changes following RCM administration (Caldicott et al, 1970;Harvey, 1960;Heyman et al, 1993;Katzberg et al, 1983;Morris et al, 1978;Norby and DiBona, 1975;Talner and Davidson, 1968). Nephrotoxicity from vasoconstriction has been postulated to be responsible for the majority of RCM nephrotoxicity (Bakris and Burnett, 1985;Byrd and Sherman, 1979;Caldicott et al, 1970;Harvey, 1960;Heyman et al, 1993;Katzberg et al, 1983;Larson et al, 1983;Morris et al, 1978;Norby and DiBona, 1975;Talner and Davidson, 1968).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Nephrotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a biphasic vascular response with a brief period of vasodilation, followed by prolonged vasoconstriction (23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Within the kidney, there appears to be a further redistribution, or shunting, of blood flow resulting in reduced flow to the medulla (28).…”
Section: Renal Ischemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hemodynamic changes may be involved, since a vasodilation occurs in most regional vascular beds following CM administration. However, in the kidney this phase is transient and followed by a sustained vasoconstriction (26,33). Unique for the kidney is the highly specialized angioarchitecture, with only $10% of renal blood directed through vasa recta, which means that the medulla even during normal conditions functions at the brink of anoxia (4,10,21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%