Digital Modeling of Material Appearance 2008
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012221181-2.50011-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rendering appearance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One approach is to learn to observe materials to decompose them into spectral, directional and spatial effects, without reference to specific computer graphics models. Examples of this type of approach have been given by Dorsey et al 38,39 This follows the tradition of teaching observation in art, although with a different view of how appearance should be analyzed. Perhaps alternative approaches to observation and understanding the features of appearance that can be transferred into numerical specifications can be developed.…”
Section: Current Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One approach is to learn to observe materials to decompose them into spectral, directional and spatial effects, without reference to specific computer graphics models. Examples of this type of approach have been given by Dorsey et al 38,39 This follows the tradition of teaching observation in art, although with a different view of how appearance should be analyzed. Perhaps alternative approaches to observation and understanding the features of appearance that can be transferred into numerical specifications can be developed.…”
Section: Current Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Also, to simulate the graphical aspect of the robot components, including the painted objects, there were used 23 materials: 11 metals, 5 plastics and 7 transparent materials. The colors of these materials were defined based on their physical properties [11].…”
Section: B the Simulation Scenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appearance of material properties has been the focus of ongoing research and publications in the fields of perceptual psychology and computer graphics. [1][2][3][4][5] Related to food appearance, the most noticeable perceptual difference between a peach and a nectarine is generally that the surface of a peach is fuzzy while that of a nectarine is smooth. An image of a nectarine can be manipulated to appear like one of a peach if the glossy highlights of the nectarine are removed and the surface is given reflection properties of a Lambertian surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%