2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16627.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rendering dark energy void

Abstract: Dark energy observations may be explained within general relativity using an inhomogeneous Hubble‐scale depression in the matter density and accompanying curvature, which evolves naturally out of an Einstein–de Sitter (EdS) model. We present a simple parametrization of a void which can reproduce concordance model distances to arbitrary accuracy, but can parametrize away from this to give a smooth density profile everywhere. We show how the Hubble constant is not just a nuisance parameter in inhomogeneous model… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
93
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work we consider a test case to demonstrate the method, and so focus on an open (Ω κ > 0), dust-only background model (Λ = 0) that is asymptotically Einsteinde Sitter, and which is known to comfortably accommodate distances to SN1a (see e.g. [7]). Here we model the total (dimensionless) matter density profile today according to:…”
Section: Background Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work we consider a test case to demonstrate the method, and so focus on an open (Ω κ > 0), dust-only background model (Λ = 0) that is asymptotically Einsteinde Sitter, and which is known to comfortably accommodate distances to SN1a (see e.g. [7]). Here we model the total (dimensionless) matter density profile today according to:…”
Section: Background Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we were to live in a large, underdense void of a few giga-parsecs in diameter, distant supernovae would appear fainter than expected in a FLRW model, and the dark energy phenomenon could be explained on purely relativistic terms without invoking any new physics (see, e.g., [5,6,7,8] and [9] for a comprehensive review). Clearly, structure formation places a key constraint on such models by probing their difference from the concordance model, and so serves as a test of the Copernican principle [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the present results, such differences in the expected number densities should be greater than the CGBH-to-FLRW ones studied here, if we were to detect a significant effect on the observed number densities caused by differences in their expected values alone. February et al (2010) argue that CMB and BAO constraints may be significantly distorted by differences in the evolution of primordial perturbations caused by the curvature inside the voids. They go on to fit a number of different shapes for the inner matter profile, considering only local Universe data, namely, SNe Ia and the reconstruction of H(z) through passively evolving galaxies.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Ltb Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sollerman et al 2009), some of them cannot be ruled out entirely yet. Among these models, motivated mainly as alternative to dark energy, various non-homogeneous cosmologies have been proposed, with an increasing interest in the past few years (Hellaby & Alfedeel 2009;Alfedeel & Hellaby 2010;February et al 2010;Biswas et al 2010;Sussman 2010;Bolejko et al 2011b;Nadathur & Sarkar 2011;Clarkson & Regis 2011;Clarkson et al 2012;Regis & Clarkson 2012;Meures & Bruni 2012;Humphreys et al 2012;Nishikawa et al 2012;Valkenburg et al 2014;Wang & Zhang 2012;Hellaby 2012;Hoyle et al 2013;de Putter et al 2012;Keenan et al 2012;Fleury et al 2013). Some recent reviews include Célérier (2007), Bolejko et al (2011a), Ellis (2011), and Krasiński (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, it was claimed that such a feature have to be considered a signal of the existence of a void (underdensity) in our neighborhood [17]. Then the fact that both, the tension between low and high redshift data and the inhomogeneous connection for this feature of the reconstructed q(z), make sense only if we assume a local underdensity, means that something in the local distribution of matter is affecting the data, something that we would like to characterize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%