emand for clean energy is soaring across developing nations in Africa, South America and southeast Asia. Governments from Myanmar to Brazil face hard decisions. Should they invest billions of dollars in tried-and-tested hydropower, damming yet more rivers to generate electricity? Or should they spend on emerging solar, wind and energy-storage technologies, the costs of which have plummeted in the past decade? Many emerging economies are planning to increase their hydropower generation. For example, Cambodia is considering spending US$5 billion-almost one-quarter of its gross domestic product-on building the Sambor dam on the Mekong River. Should it go ahead, the dam could generate 11,000 gigawatt hours (GWh) of electricity each year, a big jump from the 7,000 GWh the country generated in 2017. But a surge of dam development across the tropics threatens to interrupt the planet's last free-flowing rivers 1-including the Mekong, Congo, Amazon and Irrawaddy. The lives of millions of people and many species depend on these rivers 2. The projects address important energy needs, but advocates often overestimate economic benefits and underestimate the far-reaching effects on biodiversity and important fisheries. Powerful analytical tools and highresolution environmental data can clarify trade-offs between engineering and environmental goals, and can enable governments and funding institutions to compare many alternative scenarios for dam building and expansion of renewable energy. The proposed Sambor dam, for example, would prevent fish from migrating, threatening fisheries worth billions of dollars 3. It would further cut the supply of sediment to Deploy diverse renewables to save tropical rivers A strategic mix of solar, wind and storage technologies around river basins would be safer and cheaper than building large dams, argue Rafael J. P. Schmitt, Noah Kittner and colleagues. A microhydro turbine on the Nam Ou River in Laos generates electricity for nearby villages.