2010
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2010)097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renormalization-group improved predictions for top-quark pair production at hadron colliders

Abstract: Precision predictions for phenomenologically interesting observables such as the tt invariant mass distribution and forward-backward asymmetry in top-quark pair production at hadron colliders require control over the differential cross section in perturbative QCD. In this paper we improve existing calculations of the doubly differential cross section in the invariant mass and scattering angle by using techniques from soft-collinear effective theory to perform an NNLL resummation of threshold logarithms, which … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
319
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
(348 reference statements)
14
319
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even for an m tt -based scale that is as small as m tt /4 the deviation between the absolute predictions is large and exceeds the size of the scale error. Such scales have been used in the past [38,39] as well as recently in the resummation-based work [40,41]. Our findings seem to indicate that the large corrections found in refs.…”
Section: Jhep04(2017)071supporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even for an m tt -based scale that is as small as m tt /4 the deviation between the absolute predictions is large and exceeds the size of the scale error. Such scales have been used in the past [38,39] as well as recently in the resummation-based work [40,41]. Our findings seem to indicate that the large corrections found in refs.…”
Section: Jhep04(2017)071supporting
confidence: 68%
“…(3.4) below. Scales based on m T (3.2) have been used since the early days of NLO calculations [30,31,36,37], as well as, more recently, m tt -based scales [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Jhep04(2017)071mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[117] shown in figure 5 is adapted from figure 9 in ref. [5]: the results from [117] are NLO+NNLL (next-to-next-to-leading log); resummation is performed in momentum space with a default scale choice µ = m tt ; however, unlike figure 9 in [5], they are shown here with their normalisation not rescaled to exact NNLO. In figure 5 we notice that the approximate NNLO result of ref.…”
Section: Comparison With Approximate Nnlo/resummed Nlo Qcd Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Differential tt cross section as a function of M tt from CDF [24] (table 3, all bins but the first), to be compared with the approximate NNLO calculation of [25] (figure 12).…”
Section: Global Fit To the Top Tevatron Datamentioning
confidence: 99%