1938
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1938.1.6.477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reorganization of Motor Function in the Cerebral Cortex of Monkeys Deprived of Motor and Premotor Areas in Infancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
1
1

Year Published

1940
1940
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
75
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the lesion area in the present experiment was smaller than that in most previous studies, in which the lesions were not confined to M1, but also affected neighboring cortical areas, including premotor and primary sensory areas (Kennard 1938;Ogden and Franz 1917;Passingham et al 1983;Travis and Woolsey 1956). In the present study, lesions were largely confined to the digit area of M1, as defined by ICMS, with much smaller lesions outside M1.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Lesion Studies In Nonhuman Primatescontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Furthermore, the lesion area in the present experiment was smaller than that in most previous studies, in which the lesions were not confined to M1, but also affected neighboring cortical areas, including premotor and primary sensory areas (Kennard 1938;Ogden and Franz 1917;Passingham et al 1983;Travis and Woolsey 1956). In the present study, lesions were largely confined to the digit area of M1, as defined by ICMS, with much smaller lesions outside M1.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Lesion Studies In Nonhuman Primatescontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Evidence that new neural connections occur after perinatal brain damage in children is supported by several clinical studies (Farmer et al, 1991;C arr et al, 1993;C ao et al, 1994). Structural neuroplasticity is thought to play an essential role in recovery of function, because animals sustaining C NS lesions at a young age are known to recover much better than those sustaining similar lesions at maturity (Kennard, 1936(Kennard, , 1938Whishaw and Kolb, 1988;Armand and Kably, 1993).…”
Section: Abstract: Structural Plasticity; Rat Reaching; Motor Functimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Evidence that new neural connections occur after perinatal brain damage in children is supported by several clinical studies (Farmer et al, 1991;C arr et al, 1993;C ao et al, 1994). Structural neuroplasticity is thought to play an essential role in recovery of function, because animals sustaining C NS lesions at a young age are known to recover much better than those sustaining similar lesions at maturity (Kennard, 1936(Kennard, , 1938Whishaw and Kolb, 1988;Armand and Kably, 1993).The lack of large scale remodeling after adult C NS lesions is not well understood, but may be attributable to several reasons, including a limitation of adult neuronal growth potential, a lack or decrease in trophic factors or guidance molecules, or the presence of growth inhibitory molecules. In this regard, limits on the capacity for mature CNS plasticity may be similar to those recently identified for CNS regeneration, for which inhibitory signals present on CNS myelin have been shown to play a crucial role (for review, see Schwab and Bartholdi, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Often operations in infants produce less debilitating or less persistent deficits than similar lesions in adults (Kennard, 1938 and1942;Tucker, Kling and Scharlock, 1968;Goldman, Rosvold and Mishkin, 1970;Hicks and D'Amato, 1970;Schneider, 1970;and many others). However, in at least one case (Hicks, D'Amato, Klein, Austin and French, 1969), neonatally1Research supported by grant GB 35315X from NSF, and grants MH 19793-02 and MH 11095-07 from NIMH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%