“…In the past several years, we have demonstrated that it is possible to obtain bulk polymer samples whose structures, morphologies, and even chain conformations are significantly altered from those obtained by processing randomly coiling, entangled polymers from their solutions and melts by the usual techniques. By first forming inclusion compound (IC) crystals between guest polymers and host cyclodextrins (CDs),1–72 and then coalescing the guest polymer chains from the polymer‐CD‐ICs through removal of the host CD crystalline lattice,10, 11, 17–23, 25, 27, 28, 30–35, 37–41, 44–46, 51 we find the resulting coalesced bulk samples to be significantly reorganized. For example, we generally observe that (i) crystallizable homopolymers coalesced from their CD‐ICs evince increased levels of crystallinity, unusual polymorphs, and higher melting, crystallization, and decomposition temperatures,21, 23, 27, 31, 32, 37, 40 while coalesced amorphous homopolymers exhibit higher glass transition temperatures17, 22, 47 than samples consolidated from their disordered solutions and melts; (ii) molecularly mixed, intimate blends of two or more polymers that are normally believed to be immiscible can be achieved by coalescence from their common CD‐IC crystals,10, 17, 22, 28, 33, 34, 38, 44, 48 (iii) the phase segregation of incompatible blocks can be controlled (suppressed or increased) when block copolymers are coalesced from their CD‐IC crystals,18, 20, 25, 35 and (iv) the thermal and temporal stabilities of the well‐mixed homopolymer blends and block copolymers obtained by coalescence from their CD‐ICs appear to be substantial,10, 17, 21, 32, 33, 38, 44 thereby suggesting retention or reformation of their as‐coalesced structures and morphologies under normal thermal processing conditions.…”