2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of megameatus: A modified approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first is characterized by a ventral curvature of the penis and a normal position of the meatus with a distorted foreskin. The latter is characterized by a coronal lying meatus adjacent to a non-closed glans with a very wide open navicular fossa and a normal developed circular prepuce [21, 32]. …”
Section: Diagnostic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is characterized by a ventral curvature of the penis and a normal position of the meatus with a distorted foreskin. The latter is characterized by a coronal lying meatus adjacent to a non-closed glans with a very wide open navicular fossa and a normal developed circular prepuce [21, 32]. …”
Section: Diagnostic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, an increasing number of articles have focused on this rare hypospadias variant, and the awareness of and surgical procedures for MIP continue to evolve (4,5). Due to the anatomical particularity of MIP, it is necessary for clinicians to design a suitable surgical method taking into account the development of the glans, the width of the urethral plate, the depth of the urethral groove, and the shape and position of the urethral opening, to achieve good therapeutic effects (3,6,7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the anatomical characteristics of the MIP hypospadias variant present a unique challenge to surgeons for correction (6), increasingly more articles have been focusing on this rare condition in recent years, and awareness and surgical management of MIP continue to evolve (7,8). Although various techniques have been proposed as the "ideal repair" of the MIP hypospadias variant, none has proven superior, and no study has specifically compared the common techniques for treating MIP until now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%