2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of thoracic spinal cord injury by chitosan tube implantation in adult rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
82
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The chitosan tubes and NT3-chitosan carriers were prepared as described previously (17,18,24), with modifications. Detailed information is provided in SI Materials and Methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The chitosan tubes and NT3-chitosan carriers were prepared as described previously (17,18,24), with modifications. Detailed information is provided in SI Materials and Methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biotinylated dextran amine conjugated with fluorescein [BDA-fluorescein, 10% (wt/vol) solution; Molecular Probes] was injected into eight different sites within the motor cortex to label the CST (24). Only fibers longer than 40 μm were counted (27).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before the operation and at 1 d postsurgery and each week thereafter, observers who were blinded to the treatment methods and groups applied Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) scoring in an open field to evaluate hindlimb locomotor function (10,17). BMS was used for mouse analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major challenge in the field of SCI research is the huge variability caused not only by different lesion models and animal strains, but also by even subtle changes in the exact lesion operations. Moreover, most analyses for evaluating neural repair/regeneration have been anatomic, behavioral, and sometimes electrophysiological, including extracellular recordings (1,4,10,11). These analyses are relatively low in resolution, and particularly the behavioral assays can be highly variable and subjective to errors in human judgment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%