2014
DOI: 10.5958/j.0976-4666.59.2.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repayment Performance of Institutional Agricultural Credit in Jaipur District of Rajasthan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rahman (2011) finds that farm credit in Bangladesh may be inefficiently and insufficiently allocated, especially in the context of a positive correlation between the credit and output. Studies for India (e.g., Sharma and Kumawat, 2014) and Pakistan (e.g., Mehmood et al, 2012) also document similar situations: loans are made and monitored inefficiently, so even though credit is rationed, increasing its supply may not be welfare improving in the absence of institutional improvements such as better targeting and monitoring.…”
Section: Agricultural Creditmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Rahman (2011) finds that farm credit in Bangladesh may be inefficiently and insufficiently allocated, especially in the context of a positive correlation between the credit and output. Studies for India (e.g., Sharma and Kumawat, 2014) and Pakistan (e.g., Mehmood et al, 2012) also document similar situations: loans are made and monitored inefficiently, so even though credit is rationed, increasing its supply may not be welfare improving in the absence of institutional improvements such as better targeting and monitoring.…”
Section: Agricultural Creditmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While a large number of studies have analysed the impact of microcredit on the poor in India, a few recent ones found a modest positive effect of microfinance with no transformative effect (Banerjee et al, 2015b). Sharma and Kumawat (2014) document the inefficient targeting and monitoring of credit in India due to absence of institutional improvements, which has prevented the welfare improvement even with enhanced credit. Thus, the efficacy of banks and MFIs in reaching out and benefitting the poor is still an open question in India.…”
Section: Jfep 124mentioning
confidence: 99%