Proceedings Fourteenth Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation
DOI: 10.1109/pads.2000.847141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability in real-time distributed simulation executions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the likelihood that in some cases the messages do not arrive in time to be processed in one cycle of tick() calls. This behavior was also noted in [3] and is common for time-stepped execution models.…”
Section: Asynchronous Communicationsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is due to the likelihood that in some cases the messages do not arrive in time to be processed in one cycle of tick() calls. This behavior was also noted in [3] and is common for time-stepped execution models.…”
Section: Asynchronous Communicationsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The first main issue is the completion of an LBTS computation by a specified deadline. Our real-time timemanagement implementation builds upon previous work in achieving repeatable real-time distributed simulations [3]. A primary challenge in repeatable performance is the timeliness is the tick() function.…”
Section: Real-time Time Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the introduction we mentioned several works on protocols to solve the non-determinism issues of parallel execution (Fujimoto 2000) or real-time interactions (McLean and Fujimoto 2000). If we except these determinismrelated issues, repeatability is mainly a question of ensuring the long-term execution of a program.…”
Section: Solutions For Repeatability (Levels L1 and L2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Bacon and Goldstein 1991) classified non-determinism arising from input-data, system calls, and interrupts. Non-determinism arising from input data can be distinguished whether the input has been sent by logical processes, by externally running software, or by other sources, like human operators (McLean and Fujimoto 2000). Whereas in the context of Mole and for testing different planning agents (Uhrmacher and Gugler 2000) parallel, distributed simulators have been employed, for testing Autominder in the current virtual environment a sequential simulation suffices.…”
Section: Himmelspach Rohl and Lihrmachermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently we are designing a paced distributed simulation system which uses time-stamped messages. The underlying concept is similar to (McLean and Fujimoto 2000) in utilizing time stamps for reducing non-determinism.…”
Section: While Simulation Not Yet Finishedmentioning
confidence: 99%