2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated Closed Head Injury in Mice Results in Sustained Motor and Memory Deficits and Chronic Cellular Changes

Abstract: Millions of mild traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) occur every year in the United States, with many people subject to multiple head injuries that can lead to chronic behavioral dysfunction. We previously reported that mild TBI induced using closed head injuries (CHI) repeated at 24h intervals produced more acute neuron death and glial reactivity than a single CHI, and increasing the length of time between injuries to 48h reduced the cumulative acute effects of repeated CHI. To determine whether repeated CHI is a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
59
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(116 reference statements)
4
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, increasing the interinjury interval reduces physical, cognitive, and behavioral sequelae, as well as mortality (Kanayama et al 1996; Meehan et al 2012; Huang et al 2013; Weil et al 2014; Bolton Hall et al 2016). For example, the mortality percentage is significantly lower for piglets subjected to primary injuries 1 wk apart compared with 1 d apart (Friess et al 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, increasing the interinjury interval reduces physical, cognitive, and behavioral sequelae, as well as mortality (Kanayama et al 1996; Meehan et al 2012; Huang et al 2013; Weil et al 2014; Bolton Hall et al 2016). For example, the mortality percentage is significantly lower for piglets subjected to primary injuries 1 wk apart compared with 1 d apart (Friess et al 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans and flies, the probability of mortality following TBI is associated with age and blood/hemolymph glucose level, which is influenced by diet (Susman et al 2002; Hukkelhoven et al 2003; Griesdale et al 2009; Dhandapani et al 2012; Katzenberger et al 2013, 2015a; Wang et al 2013; Borsage et al 2015; Chong et al 2015). Furthermore, studies of repetitive primary injuries in mammals and flies indicate that the time between primary injuries can affect the probability of mortality (Kanayama et al 1996; Friess et al 2009; Meehan et al 2012; Huang et al 2013; Weil et al 2014; Bolton Hall et al 2016) (Figure 1 and Figure 3). Thus, evolutionarily conserved age-, diet-, and interinjury interval-regulated mechanisms appear to promote secondary injuries that cause mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the link between ONSD enlargement on an initial CT scan and raised intracranial pressure also needs to be confirmed by further studies (Masquere et al, 2013). Previously, it was shown that repeated mild TBI produced more acute neuron death and glial reactivity than a single TBI along with persistent behavioral dysfunction and chronic pathological changes within the visual system but the symptoms are not associated with lengthening the inter-injury interval (Bolton Hall et al, 2016). More studies are needed to understand in depth how repeated TBI affects the structural and functional integrity of visual systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a mouse model of repetitive mild closed head injury, five impacts spaced 24h or 48h apart results in motor and cognitive deficits, axonal degeneration and astrogliosis, particularly in the visual system, ten weeks following injury; however, increases in hyperphosphorylated tau were not seen (Bolton Hall et al , 2016). Similarly, although exposing mice to five injuries spaced 24h apart results in increased hemorrhagic lesions, diffuse axonal injury, neurodegeneration, and astrogliosis 24h post-injury compared to intervals spaced 48h apart, neither injury paradigm results in increased tau phosphorylation (Bolton and Saatman, 2014).…”
Section: Tbi Tau and Cte - The Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%