2003
DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated graft loss caused by recurrent hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation

Abstract: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is a main cause of graft loss and patient mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Several surgical and nonsurgical risk factors have been associated with HAT. Retransplantation often is the only possible treatment for this complication; however, the incidence of recurrence of HAT after retransplantation and the underlying conditions of this occurrence have never been investigated. Of 629 consecutive recipients transplanted at a single institution, 24 underwent re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in 127 LTs, patient death (84 cases) or graft loss (43 cases) occurred in the first 30 postoperative days without evidence of HAT (median graft survival, 9 days; range, 0–30 days); 3 LTs were followed by HAT, in which a kinking of the hepatic artery was demonstrated (these complications were excluded from the analysis as they were considered the consequences of a technical failure); 10 LTs employed split‐liver grafts from cadaveric donor (split‐liver transplantation involves a higher risk of HAT)3; 2 LTs were performed on pediatric recipients (the incidence of HAT is significantly higher in pediatric LT)4; 3 LTs were performed on patients who were diagnosed with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria after the loss of 3 consecutive grafts due to HAT5; and 1 LT involved arterial anastomosis done with a Gore‐Tex graft. The analysis therefore included 838 adult LTs with a median follow‐up of 1,704 days (range, 33–7,017 days) (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in 127 LTs, patient death (84 cases) or graft loss (43 cases) occurred in the first 30 postoperative days without evidence of HAT (median graft survival, 9 days; range, 0–30 days); 3 LTs were followed by HAT, in which a kinking of the hepatic artery was demonstrated (these complications were excluded from the analysis as they were considered the consequences of a technical failure); 10 LTs employed split‐liver grafts from cadaveric donor (split‐liver transplantation involves a higher risk of HAT)3; 2 LTs were performed on pediatric recipients (the incidence of HAT is significantly higher in pediatric LT)4; 3 LTs were performed on patients who were diagnosed with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria after the loss of 3 consecutive grafts due to HAT5; and 1 LT involved arterial anastomosis done with a Gore‐Tex graft. The analysis therefore included 838 adult LTs with a median follow‐up of 1,704 days (range, 33–7,017 days) (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, surgical shunts, and liver transplantation may lead to transient improvement, but these modalities are ultimately unsuccessful because of ongoing hypercoagulability and recurrent thrombosis. The rare reports of outcomes in patients undergoing liver transplant for BCS secondary to PNH not only detail instances of recurrent BCS but also indicate the occurrence of early portal vein occlusion and hepatic artery thrombosis requiring retransplantation5–10 (Table 1). Given the high risk of thrombotic complications, most centers regard PNH as a contraindication to liver transplantation.…”
Section: Case Reports Of Liver Transplantation For Bcs In Patients Wimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our clinical results are similar to those reported in the literature. [11][12][13] This patient was retransplanted almost 1 year from the previous liver retransplant. Influenced by experience coming from other centers, we postponed the liver retransplant by nearly half a year so as to achieve a better outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%