Repetition blindness, forward and backward.

Neill, Wilfred T.; Neely, James H.; Hutchison, Keith A.; Kahan, Todd A.; Verwys, Christopher A.

doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.1.137-149

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In sum, our results support the conclusion that neither RB nor the RLIE is produced by response strategies (cf. Anderson & Neill, 2002;Neill, Neely, Hutchison, Kahan, & VerWys, 2002). Rather, we attribute these effects to deficits in perceptual encoding of identical stimuli (see Anderson & Neill, 2002;Johnston, Hochhaus, & Ruthruff, 2002;and Neill et al, 2002, for similar conclusions).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

When do irrelevant visual stimuli impair processing of identical targets?

Wühr

Müsseler

2005

Perception & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three experiments investigated whether the repeated-letter inferiority effect (RLIE) and repetition blindness (RB) are identical phenomena or not and how the RLIE can be reconciled with the flanker compatibility effect (FCE). Participants reported a masked target and ignored an unmasked distractor. We manipulated the type of distractor (identical, alternative target, or neutral), the order of presenting distractor and target, and the predictability of target location. When distractors preceded the targets, distractors identical to the target always caused deficits in target processing (i.e., RB). With simultaneous presentation, identical distractors caused deficits (i.e., an RLIE) for unpredictable target locations only. Yet the RLIE was significantly smaller than RB. This result suggests that simultaneously presented stimuli are identified serially, in random order, if target position is unpredictable. As a result, RB arises only in the 50% of all trials with identical distractors in which the distractor is identified before the target. With simultaneous presentation and predictable target location, however, parallel processing of targets and distractors was possible that gave rise to an FCE in recognition accuracy. Analyses of false alarm rates revealed no evidence of significant response biases.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

When do irrelevant visual stimuli impair processing of identical targets?

Wühr

Müsseler

2005

Perception & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…First, both experiments used identical items for repeated stimuli so the directionality of RB cannot be determined. This is important to consider because backward RB -C2 is identified but CI is missed -has been observed in a few experiments (Neill, Neely, Hutchison, Kahan, & VerWys, 2002). A second reason for further investigation is that awareness and duration most likely co-varied in these experiments so their individual influences on RB cannot be determined.…”

Section: Evidence For the Role Of Awareness In Rbmentioning

confidence: 99%

The roles of awareness and encoding effectiveness in repetition blindness

Still¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Awareness and RB 3 Evidence for the role of awareness in RB 9 Determining the direction of RB Duration and awareness confound Eliminating the duration and awareness confound Experimental design Chapter 2. Experiment 1 Method Participants Materials Procedure Results and discussion Early RB condition Long distance RB condition Three critical condition Chapter 3. Experiment 2 Method Participants Materials Procedure Results and discussion Early RB condition Long distance RB condition Late RB condition Three critical condition Magnitude of RB Chapter 4. Experiment 3 Method Participants Materials and procedure Results and discussion Early RB condition Ill Long distance RB condition Late RB condition Three critical condition Magnitude of RB Manipulation check Chapter 5. General Discussion Why might awareness be related to RB? Recapitulation of results What contributes to encoding effectiveness?

show abstract

Repetition blindness, forward and backward.

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

When do irrelevant visual stimuli impair processing of identical targets?

When do irrelevant visual stimuli impair processing of identical targets?

The roles of awareness and encoding effectiveness in repetition blindness

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About