1991
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90099-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repetition effects in a lexical decision task: The role of episodic memory in the performance of alcoholic Korsakoff patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, repetition priming effects emerge for nonwords as well as for words in normals, although the effects seem to be smaller and less robust (Mimura et al, 1997). This implicit information processing paradigm has been shown to be preserved in patients with memory disorders (Verfaellie, Cermak, Letourneau, & Zuffante, 1991), and, like the semantic priming phenomenon, appears to occur automatically, without the conscious intervention of the subject.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, repetition priming effects emerge for nonwords as well as for words in normals, although the effects seem to be smaller and less robust (Mimura et al, 1997). This implicit information processing paradigm has been shown to be preserved in patients with memory disorders (Verfaellie, Cermak, Letourneau, & Zuffante, 1991), and, like the semantic priming phenomenon, appears to occur automatically, without the conscious intervention of the subject.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Korsakoff patients, like memory-intact subjects, show greater repetition priming effects of low-frequency words than ofhighfrequency words in the lexical decision task (Verfaellie, Cermak, Letourneau, & Zuffante, 1991). In recognition memory tests, Korsakoff patients have shown better performance with low-frequency words than with highfrequency words (Huppert & Piercy, 1976;Verfaellie et al, 1991). Because amnesic subjects perform poorly on tests that require conscious recollection, taken together it seems most parsimonious to interpret these findings in terms of a common perceptual fluency component intact in amnesic subjects that underlies both repetition priming and feelings of familiarity.…”
Section: Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australiamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Korsakoff patients, like memory-intact subjects, show greater repetition priming effects of low-frequency words than ofhighfrequency words in the lexical decision task (Verfaellie, Cermak, Letourneau, & Zuffante, 1991). In recognition memory tests, Korsakoff patients have shown better performance with low-frequency words than with highfrequency words (Huppert & Piercy, 1976;Verfaellie et al, 1991).…”
Section: Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australiamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, repetition priming tasks measure memory as the change in speed, accuracy, or bias in responses to studied relative to baseline items. Priming is often intact in amnesic patients who cannot recollect study episodes (Cermak, Talbot, Chandler, & Wolbast, 1985;Graf, Shimamura, & Squire, 1985;Graf, Squire, & Mandler, 1984;Shimamura, 1986;Vaidya, Gabrieli, Keane, & Monti, 1995;Verfaellie, Cermak, Letourneau, & Zuffante, 1991) and independent of performance on direct tests of recall or recognition in young, healthy participants (e.g., Tulving, Schacter, & Stark, 1982). Thus, different neural systems and memory processes appear to mediate explicit and implicit memory retrieval.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%