2019
DOI: 10.1536/ihj.19-076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replacement of an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) with a New Standard Subcutaneous ICD System in a Patient with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen Syndrome

Abstract: A 7-year-old female suffering from syncope attacks and deafness was genetically diagnosed with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome (JLNS). A transvenous-designed shock lead and implantable cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD) were atypically implanted subcutaneously, because the patient's body was small. Six years after implantation, we confirmed the patient's eligibility for a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) based on electrocardiogram screening. The implanted ICD system was replaced with a new standard S-ICD system. Impla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, considering the young age of patients and the lifelong risk of vascular access issues and infection, the S-ICD appears as a promising option to improve the benefit/risk balance in this specific population. However, clinical experience with the use of S-ICD in paediatric patients is still very limited, 21 , 22 this approach is generally not suitable in small children under 30 kg, 23 and we still have to learn about the potential impact of growth on long-term appropriate sensing and defibrillation field with this technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, considering the young age of patients and the lifelong risk of vascular access issues and infection, the S-ICD appears as a promising option to improve the benefit/risk balance in this specific population. However, clinical experience with the use of S-ICD in paediatric patients is still very limited, 21 , 22 this approach is generally not suitable in small children under 30 kg, 23 and we still have to learn about the potential impact of growth on long-term appropriate sensing and defibrillation field with this technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%