2014
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005970.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
12
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…it was shown that 1 year after repair the failure rate was low and repairs were less likely to need aggressive treatment. Our results are then consistent with findings from other studies carried out in Australia, North America, Europe and Saudi Arabia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…it was shown that 1 year after repair the failure rate was low and repairs were less likely to need aggressive treatment. Our results are then consistent with findings from other studies carried out in Australia, North America, Europe and Saudi Arabia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The literature on repair procedures does not provide adequate clinical evidence on the clinical steps or protocols for managing restoration defects properly. Furthermore, the criteria on whether to repair or replace a restoration are not fully defined, and only recently have criteria and clinical recommendations been provided to help in the decision‐making process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, repeated replacement leads to an increase in cavity size (Mjör ). Sharif et al (, ) and Martin et al () came to the same conclusion. They evaluated amalgam restorations that were treated by repair or replacement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…8,36,38,44,45,48,53,55,[72][73][74][75] Además de ser una acción conservadora, presenta buena relación costo-efectividad, dado que es bajo en demanda de tiempo y efectivamente elimina los defectos marginales que podrían predisponer al desarrollo de la caries secundaria. 42,[76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84] No existiendo aún publicaciones sobre sus contraindicaciones o recomendaciones sobre la magnitud máxima y efectos de la localización y extensión de la brecha para indicar su sellado.…”
unclassified