1998
DOI: 10.1038/26766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replication checkpoint requires phosphorylation of the phosphatase Cdc25 by Cds1 or Chk1

Abstract: Checkpoints maintain the order and fidelity of events of the cell cycle by blocking mitosis in response to unreplicated or damaged DNA. In most species this is accomplished by preventing activation of the cell-division kinase Cdc2, which regulates entry into mitosis. The Chk1 kinase, an effector of the DNA-damage checkpoint, phosphorylates Cdc25, an activator of Cdc2. Phosphorylation of Cdc25 promotes its binding to 14-3-3 proteins, preventing it from activating Cdc2. Here we propose that a similar pathway is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
338
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
15
338
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same 9-1-1 and Rad3-Rad26 checkpoint protein complexes may associate with the DNA replication complex [13]. However, the DNA replication checkpoint acts primarily through phosphorylation of Cds1 kinase, which is mediated by another protein Mrc1 [22,23], with minor participation of Chk1 kinase, and either kinase is sufficient by itself to give cell cycle arrest when DNA synthesis is inhibited [24]. Activated Cds1 kinase inactivates Cdc25 through a similar mechanism as Chk1 [1,24].…”
Section: Cell Cycle G2/m Controls and Check-pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The same 9-1-1 and Rad3-Rad26 checkpoint protein complexes may associate with the DNA replication complex [13]. However, the DNA replication checkpoint acts primarily through phosphorylation of Cds1 kinase, which is mediated by another protein Mrc1 [22,23], with minor participation of Chk1 kinase, and either kinase is sufficient by itself to give cell cycle arrest when DNA synthesis is inhibited [24]. Activated Cds1 kinase inactivates Cdc25 through a similar mechanism as Chk1 [1,24].…”
Section: Cell Cycle G2/m Controls and Check-pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the DNA replication checkpoint acts primarily through phosphorylation of Cds1 kinase, which is mediated by another protein Mrc1 [22,23], with minor participation of Chk1 kinase, and either kinase is sufficient by itself to give cell cycle arrest when DNA synthesis is inhibited [24]. Activated Cds1 kinase inactivates Cdc25 through a similar mechanism as Chk1 [1,24]. Cds1 also activates the Mik1 kinase, which phosphorylate Tyr15 of Cdc2 [25].…”
Section: Cell Cycle G2/m Controls and Check-pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent work has identi®ed the mitotic inducer cdc25 as the target for this checkpoint pathway. Chk1 and cds1 are protein kinases which, when active, phosphorylate cdc25 (Zeng et al, 1998). This, in turn, promotes the binding of a 14-3-3 protein (Furnari et al, 1997;Peng et al, 1997;Sanchez et al, 1997), which escorts cdc25 out of the nucleus and thus prevents activation of the mitotic cyclin B/cdc2 kinase (Lopez-Girona et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic and biochemical approaches have identified sensors that detect incompletely replicated or damaged DNA and that stimulate signal transduction pathways that lead to activation of the kinases Chk1 and Chk2/Cds1 (reviewed in Sancar et al, 2004). Both Chk1 and Chk2 can phosphorylate cdc25C on Ser287 (human Ser216), which creates a binding site for 14-3-3 proteins; this is thought to inhibit cdc25C activation and thus the G 2 /M transition (Peng et al, 1997;Sanchez et al, 1997;Kumagai et al, 1998b;Matsuoka et al, 1998;Zeng et al, 1998). The mechanisms by which phosphorylation of this residue and 14-3-3 binding suppress cdc25C's ability to dephosphorylate cdc2, including changes in its subcellular localization in some types of cell cycles (Dalal et al, 1999;Kumagai and Dunphy, 1999;Lopez-Girona et al, 1999;Yang et al, 1999;Graves et al, 2001), are still being worked out.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%