1992
DOI: 10.1093/arclin/7.3.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replication of a three-component solution for common measures of attention in HIV seropositive males

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to neuropsychological assessment, it is well known that test results might be interpreted in many ways because a test never taps only one but a whole range of cognitive functions, requiring several different skills for completion [38,74]. The present study has contributed to the understanding of which scores from each test are related to different attentional mechanisms underlying performance (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…With respect to neuropsychological assessment, it is well known that test results might be interpreted in many ways because a test never taps only one but a whole range of cognitive functions, requiring several different skills for completion [38,74]. The present study has contributed to the understanding of which scores from each test are related to different attentional mechanisms underlying performance (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…To date, however, this type of research has not been undertaken in the area of attention. Thus, in the literature, researchers adopting the information processing approach prefer to use specifically defined experimental tasks to study the effects of brain damage on attention (e.g., Sergeant & Scholten, 1983;Shum, McFarland, Bain, & Humphries, 1990a), and clinicians continue to use conventional psychological tests to diagnosis attentional problems in braindamaged patients (e.g., Picano, Klusman, Hornbostel, & Moulton, 1992;Shum, McFarland, & Bain, 1990b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%