2018
DOI: 10.1029/2017ja025039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Comment by Zhang et al. on the Paper “Long‐Term Variations of Exospheric Temperature Inferred From foF1 Observations: A Comparison to ISR Ti Trend Estimates” by Perrone and Mikhailov

Abstract: The majority of Zhang et al. critical comments concern our method to retrieve aeronomic parameters from ionosonde f o F 1 observations. The main idea of the method was described by Mikhailov and Perrone (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022716), but it is seen that an additional clarification is required. The method has been slightly changed to meet numerous comments of referees, and its description is given here. The comments by Zhang et al. are analyzed and answered. PERRONE AND MIKHAILOV8895

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a commentary paper, Zhang et al. (2018) pointed out that their approach, developed in the authors’ earlier papers (also similar to what is used in MP20), is questionable; however, the reply by Perrone and Mikhailov (2018) did not seem to have addressed some of the key issues raised in the Zhang et al. (2018) commentary.…”
Section: The Methodology Used In Mp20 Is Questionable and In Fact Incorrect And The Results Lack Of Proper Uncertainty Estimate And Verifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a commentary paper, Zhang et al. (2018) pointed out that their approach, developed in the authors’ earlier papers (also similar to what is used in MP20), is questionable; however, the reply by Perrone and Mikhailov (2018) did not seem to have addressed some of the key issues raised in the Zhang et al. (2018) commentary.…”
Section: The Methodology Used In Mp20 Is Questionable and In Fact Incorrect And The Results Lack Of Proper Uncertainty Estimate And Verifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018) and they are repeated again. Our detailed answer was given by Perrone and Mikhailov (2018b), so there is no need to explain the method once again. Our method is not a 1‐D model (as the authors of Comments call it) but a method to extract a consistent set of the main aeronomic parameters responsible for the formation of noontime F‐layer at middle latitudes using observed Ne(h) distribution.…”
Section: The Methodology Used In Mp20 Is Questionable and In Fact Incorrect And The Results Lack Of Proper Uncertainty Estimate And Verifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this zero trend in [O] was accompanied by a very large trend of ‐18 K/decade in noontime exospheric temperature and this result contradicts satellite drag observations by Emmert (). The problem of unreal Tex trends inferred from ISR observations was discussed by Perrone and Mikhailov (). Wrong Tex ISR trends cast doubts on atomic oxygen long‐term trends as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%