2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.101.028502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to “Comment on ‘Boosted Kerr black holes in general relativity”’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing these results with the boosted Kerr case [14] one may easily see that the ultimate effect of a nonvanishing charge is to shrink the overall size of the event horizon and ergosphere areas. Moreover, taking into account that Σ depends on the boost parameter γ according to (2)-(3), one should expect a deformed ergosphere for a nonvanishing boost parameter.…”
Section: Spacetime Structurementioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Comparing these results with the boosted Kerr case [14] one may easily see that the ultimate effect of a nonvanishing charge is to shrink the overall size of the event horizon and ergosphere areas. Moreover, taking into account that Σ depends on the boost parameter γ according to (2)-(3), one should expect a deformed ergosphere for a nonvanishing boost parameter.…”
Section: Spacetime Structurementioning
confidence: 86%
“…In [11,12] the authors break the axial symmetry applying a Lorentz boost on Kerr-Schild coordinates of a Kerr metric. All the above mentioned approaches are however rather different when compared to the results shown in [13][14][15]. In this case the authors obtain an analytic approximate solution of a boosted Kerr black hole relative to a Lorentz frame at future null infinity which should be expected to correspond to the final configuration of a remnant black hole originated from the collision/merger of a system of spinning black holes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations