2007
DOI: 10.1021/la7026048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Comment on Evaporation-Induced Patterns from Droplets Containing Motile and Nonmotile Bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By simply controlling the buildup of atmospheric components on the surface, one can manipulate residue size and interior deposition. Nellimoottil et al [8] replied that both the motile and non-motile bacteria were from identical strains and therefore should have had equal stickiness, that bacteria swimming randomly should move down the bacterial concentration gradient, and there was no food for chemotaxis because the bacteria were washed twice in doubly distilled sterilized water. They reported that non-motile bacteria deposited preferentially at the residue edge relative to motile bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By simply controlling the buildup of atmospheric components on the surface, one can manipulate residue size and interior deposition. Nellimoottil et al [8] replied that both the motile and non-motile bacteria were from identical strains and therefore should have had equal stickiness, that bacteria swimming randomly should move down the bacterial concentration gradient, and there was no food for chemotaxis because the bacteria were washed twice in doubly distilled sterilized water. They reported that non-motile bacteria deposited preferentially at the residue edge relative to motile bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%