2000
DOI: 10.1021/jp994495u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Comment on “Rate Constants for CH3 + O2 → CH3O + O at High Temperature and Evidence for H2CO + O2 → HCO + HO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These conditions are similar to those used by Hwang et al 5 who were careful to take boundary layer effects into account in determining total density and temperature. 7,8 It is clear from Figure 12 that the mechanism as presented does predict chain branching and is sufficient to test ignition delay experiments. We point out that the mechanism should only be used in the initial stages of reactions because it is not detailed enough to explain the chemistry occurring in the high conversion regime.…”
Section: Implications To Methane Combustionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These conditions are similar to those used by Hwang et al 5 who were careful to take boundary layer effects into account in determining total density and temperature. 7,8 It is clear from Figure 12 that the mechanism as presented does predict chain branching and is sufficient to test ignition delay experiments. We point out that the mechanism should only be used in the initial stages of reactions because it is not detailed enough to explain the chemistry occurring in the high conversion regime.…”
Section: Implications To Methane Combustionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The disagreement of rate constant values and the neglect of eq 1b prompted a comment from Eiteneer and Frenklach 6 and responses from Michael et al 7 and Hwang et al 8 Scire et al 9 and Hessler et al 10 have also indicated that their results cannot be explained without some significance for reaction 1b. The large spread in values for the branching ratio between eqs 1b and 1c, 3 along with the cited controversy, [6][7][8][9][10] motivated the recent shock tube study by Herbon et al 11 who used both O-atom ARAS and OH-radical electronic absorption detection methods to assess the branching ratio. Between 1590 and 2430 K, their results for eq 1c were in good agreement with Hwang et al 5 and were only 32% higher than those by Michael et al 4 They did however find that eq 1b was the major process over their temperature range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reactions – present three competitive channels for oxidation of CH 3 , the most stable alkyl radical appearing in many combustion processes . However, their relative importance appears controversial. The channel R2 represents branching chain oxidation, important for radical reaction propagation . Mechanisms of R1 , starting from methyl radical and oxygen diatomic in the gas phase (and continuing to H 2 C­(O)­OH and CH­(OH) 2 ), were reported by Cheung and Li .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to transform the measured absorbance (ABS) O to O-atom concentration, the O-atom photometer has to be calibrated. In previous studies, [O] was calibrated by applying two methods: (1) the thermal dissociation of N 2 O and (2) using the reaction H + O 2 → OH + O . In the second method, C 2 H 5 I was used as thermal precursor for H-atoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reaction mechanism with well-established rate constants was utilized for determining (ABS) O against [O] formed in the H + O 2 reaction system. A curve-of-growth, Figure , was obtained by combining the two methods. , All data points were fitted by applying a second-order polynomial least-squares analysis giving [ O ] = 2.2108 × 10 10 + 8.7891 × 10 12 false( ABS false) normalO + 5.5278 × 10 12 false( ABS false) normalO 2 .25em atoms cm 3 This function was then used to transform the measured (ABS) t for O 3 decomposition into [O] t . Figure shows a derived O-atom profile for the experiment shown in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%