1997
DOI: 10.1029/97gl02947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply [to “Comment on ‘The measurement of tropospheric OH radicals by laser‐induced fluorescence spectroscopy during the POPCORN field campaign’ by Hofzumahaus et al. and ‘Intercomparison of tropospheric OH radical measurements by multiple folded long‐path laser absorption and laser induced fluorescence’ by Brauers et al.”]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this equation, φ OH+H is the quantum yield of OH from water photolysis and σ H 2 O is the absorption cross section of water (7.14 × 10 −20 cm −2 molecule −1 ; Cantrell et al, 1997;Hofzumahaus et al, 1997;Creasey et al, 2000). The product of the photon flux (F ) and the photolysis time (t) can be determined from oxygen actinometry, as the photolysis of oxygen at 185 nm leads to the production of ozone (Reactions R6 and R7;Okabe, 1978):…”
Section: Instrument Calibration For Oh and Homentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this equation, φ OH+H is the quantum yield of OH from water photolysis and σ H 2 O is the absorption cross section of water (7.14 × 10 −20 cm −2 molecule −1 ; Cantrell et al, 1997;Hofzumahaus et al, 1997;Creasey et al, 2000). The product of the photon flux (F ) and the photolysis time (t) can be determined from oxygen actinometry, as the photolysis of oxygen at 185 nm leads to the production of ozone (Reactions R6 and R7;Okabe, 1978):…”
Section: Instrument Calibration For Oh and Homentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lineshape depends on the operating conditions of the lamp as a result of line reversal and potential fluorescence of the fused silica envelope (Cantrell et al, 1997;Hofzumahaus et al, 1997;Lanzendorf et al, 1997).…”
Section: Instrument Calibration For Oh and Homentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7), was corrected by a profile factor, which accounts for the variation in axial velocity across the laminar flow in the calibration tube, defined as [O 3 ] excess /[O 3 ] centre , which was determined experimentally to be 1.94±0.07. Several studies have shown that the effective absorption cross section of O 2 at 185 nm depends on the individual photolysis lamp used (and its operating conditions) and the O 2 column through which the radiation propagates (Cantrell et al, 1997;Creasey et al, 2000;Hofzumahaus et al, 1997) and as a result σ 184.9 nm(O 2 ) was measured for the actual lamp and operating conditions used in the field calibrations. OH and HO 2 calibrations were carried out daily during the NAMBLEX campaign.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrumental reproducibility (precision) based upon calibration was 6%. The uncertainty (accuracy) of the measurements, which had been determined during an intercalibration experiment to AE20% (see also Hofzumahaus et al, 1997), must now be considered as 100%À20%, since Mihele and Hastie (1998) reported the radical ampli®cation to depend on moisture. From March to the beginning of May the temperatures were below freezing so that the error from disregarding the dependence on water vapour might then be small.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%