2009
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to ‘Comments on ‘Boundary element‐free method (BEFM) and its application to two‐dimensional elasticity problems’’ by Zhigang Chen, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2008; 74:347–348

Abstract: In our paper [1], using the Schmidt method, the orthogonal basis function set p = ( p i ) with the weight function can be formed as follows:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inner product (13) and the norm (14) are also taken as the inner product and the norm of the corresponding functions, respectively.…”
Section: Moving Least-squares Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The inner product (13) and the norm (14) are also taken as the inner product and the norm of the corresponding functions, respectively.…”
Section: Moving Least-squares Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also fewer coefficients in the improved moving least-squares approximation than there are in the MLS approximation, and hence the computing speed and efficiency have increased. Combining the boundary integral equation method with the improved moving least-squares approximation, Cheng and Liew et al [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] come up with a direct meshless boundary integral equation method, called boundary element-free method (BEFM), to solve the problems, such as potential problems, elasticity, elastodynamics, and fracture. And the improved element-free Galerkin method based on the improved moving least-squares approximation was discussed by Zhang, Liew and Cheng [21][22][23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The element-free or mesh-free methods have been extensively researched because of its important application for solving mathematical and physical problems [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]; especially when the traditional computational methods are not well suited for such problems that involved extremely large deformation, dynamic fracturing or explosion problems [11]. Based on different approximation functions, various element-free or mesh-free methods were proposed, including the element-free Galerkin method [12], the hp clouds method [13], the moving least-squares differential quadrature method [14,15], the reproducing kernel particle method [16], wavelet particle method [17], the radial point interpolation method [18][19][20], the complex variable meshless method [21,22] and the meshless boundary integral equation methods [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%