2001
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Shaffer regarding reply to ?Burning down DEFECT11?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I am not alone in pursuing this lofty goal as others have also taken up the gauntlet to rid of offensive terminology in the medical literature [Biesecker and Pilz, 2001; Sheffer, 2001; Wuyts et al, 2001].…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I am not alone in pursuing this lofty goal as others have also taken up the gauntlet to rid of offensive terminology in the medical literature [Biesecker and Pilz, 2001; Sheffer, 2001; Wuyts et al, 2001].…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wider issue is that of acronyms in clinical labels. One of us [Biesecker and Pilz, 2001] has argued that acronyms are suboptimal descriptors precisely because of the problem that Dr. Alomari has raised—improved understanding of the range of the disorder may show that a feature not recognized in the original description turns out to be frequent or important, or conversely, a finding originally thought to be common is not typical. These changes in understanding can render acronyms obsolete or misleading.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I am not alone in pursuing this lofty goal as others have also taken up the gauntlet to rid of offensive terminology in the medical literature [Biesecker and Pilz, 2001;Sheffer, 2001;Wuyts et al, 2001].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Pacman dysplasia is not as offensive as the term ''funny looking kid'' or FLK that we oldsters casually bandied about in our clinics without realizing the effect that such insensitive terminology had on the parents. I am not alone in pursuing this lofty goal as others have also taken up the gauntlet to rid of offensive terminology in the medical literature [Biesecker and Pilz, 2001;Sheffer, 2001;Wuyts et al, 2001].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%